• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与未使用增强装置的重建相比,使用内置支撑增强装置进行前交叉韧带重建可减少再断裂的发生。

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Results in Fewer Reruptures Compared to Reconstruction without Augmentation.

作者信息

Novaretti João Victor, Dias Junior Claudio Paula Pessoa, Lima Lucas Santos, Amaro Joicemar Tarouco, Gomes Daniel Esperante, Cohen Moises

机构信息

Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Centro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Esporte, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Instituto Cohen, São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 21;59(6):e868-e875. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785663. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785663
PMID:39711619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11663066/
Abstract

To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using autografts with and without internal brace augmentation.  Data from patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts, with a minimum follow-up of one year, with or without internal brace augmentation were collected prospectively analyzed retrospectively. The Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were collected before and after surgery, as well as data on postoperative complications. For the comparison of means of the two groups, we used the Student test or the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, when the assumption of normality of the data was rejected.  In total, 55 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation and another 55 patients underwent ACL reconstruction without internal brace augmentation. The patients were aged between 16 and 63 years (mean of 32.7 ± 11.4 years). A total of 62 patients (56.4%) underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft, and 19 patients (17.3%), with quadriceps tendon graft, with a diameter variation of 7 mm to 11 mm (mean of 8.95 ± 0.83 mm). The postoperative scores did not differ between the groups (  > 0.05). Regarding the group submitted to ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation, 4 patients had complications: @ cases of arthrofibrosis, 2 (3.7%); 1 case of rerupture (1.8%); and 1 case of thrombosis (1.8%). In the group submitted to ACL reconstruction without augmentation, 7 patients manifested complications: 2 cases of arthrofibrosis (3.9%); 4 cases of rerupture (7.3%); and 1 case of infection (2%).  The results of the present study show that fewer cases of ACL rerupture were observed after reconstruction with internal brace augmentation when compared with ACL reconstruction without augmentation, although no differences in functional scores were found.

摘要

比较使用自体移植物且有或无内置支撑增强的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的临床结果。前瞻性收集接受腘绳肌和股四头肌肌腱自体移植物进行ACL重建且随访至少一年、有或无内置支撑增强的患者数据,并进行回顾性分析。收集手术前后的Lysholm和Tegner功能评分以及术后并发症数据。对于两组均值的比较,当数据正态性假设被拒绝时,我们使用Student检验或Mann-Whitney非参数检验。

总共55例患者接受了内置支撑增强的ACL重建,另外55例患者接受了无内置支撑增强的ACL重建。患者年龄在16至63岁之间(平均32.7±11.4岁)。共有62例患者(56.4%)接受了腘绳肌移植物的ACL重建,19例患者(17.3%)接受了股四头肌肌腱移植物的ACL重建,移植物直径在7毫米至11毫米之间(平均8.95±0.83毫米)。两组术后评分无差异(P>0.05)。在接受内置支撑增强的ACL重建组中,4例患者出现并发症:2例关节纤维化(3.7%);1例再断裂(1.8%);1例血栓形成(1.8%)。在未进行增强的ACL重建组中,7例患者出现并发症:2例关节纤维化(3.9%);4例再断裂(7.3%);1例感染(2%)。

本研究结果表明,与无增强的ACL重建相比,内置支撑增强的重建术后观察到的ACL再断裂病例较少,尽管功能评分未发现差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6f49891b9969/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/d34680dfd9a7/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/773ac98efd6a/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/ae169f8cafb5/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/8787d1581b4d/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/7fac5558beb7/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6d14e9f2099e/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/24c0537701d2/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/133b99d27f50/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6e4833003152/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6e4620521b22/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/47510ddf6e3c/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6f49891b9969/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/d34680dfd9a7/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/773ac98efd6a/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/ae169f8cafb5/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/8787d1581b4d/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/7fac5558beb7/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6d14e9f2099e/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180en-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/24c0537701d2/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/133b99d27f50/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6e4833003152/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6e4620521b22/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/47510ddf6e3c/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfce/11663066/6f49891b9969/10-1055-s-0044-1785663-i2300180pt-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Results in Fewer Reruptures Compared to Reconstruction without Augmentation.与未使用增强装置的重建相比,使用内置支撑增强装置进行前交叉韧带重建可减少再断裂的发生。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 21;59(6):e868-e875. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785663. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Early clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft tendon augmentation using the LARS internal brace ligament.使用LARS内置支撑韧带自体肌腱增强技术进行全关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的早期临床结果
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 15;13:1556106. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1556106. eCollection 2025.
3
Both Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts Offer Similar Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 50 Years or Older.对于50岁及以上患者,在关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术后,腘绳肌腱和股四头肌肌腱自体移植物的功能结局相似。
Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1512-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.06.044. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Independently Tensioned Suture Tape Augmentation at 5-Year Follow-up.5 年随访时独立拉紧的缝线带增强前交叉韧带重建的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3658-3664. doi: 10.1177/03635465231207623. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Return to Sports After ACL Augmentation With Anterolateral Reconstruction (ALR) Harvesting Gracilis Only Compared With ACL Reconstruction With ALR Harvesting Both Hamstring Tendons.仅采用腘绳肌腱前外侧重建(ALR)取股薄肌重建前交叉韧带(ACL)与 ACL 重建同时采用 ALR 取双侧腘绳肌腱相比,ACL 增强后重返运动。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;51(11):2918-2927. doi: 10.1177/03635465231187038. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study.在初次前交叉韧带重建中,股四头肌肌腱和腘绳肌腱移植物之间没有差异:一项 2 年的患者报告结局研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):605-614. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4554-2. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with ligament augmentation and reconstruction systems compared with four-strand hamstring tendon grafts alone.与单纯四股绳肌腱移植相比,使用自体腘绳肌并辅以韧带增强和重建系统进行单束前交叉韧带重建的临床和关节镜检查结果。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jan;47(1):151-164. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05588-7. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
All-inside arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with internal brace Ligament Augmentation using semitendinosus tendon autograft: A case series.关节镜下全内置前交叉韧带重建术联合使用半腱肌腱自体移植的内部支撑韧带增强术:病例系列
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2022 Jul 1;29:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2022.05.002. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Graft.解剖学前交叉韧带重建的结果:骨-股四头肌腱移植与双束腘绳肌腱移植对比
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2323-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650666. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
10
Impact of Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure Augmentation on Rerupture Risk and Tegner Activity Scale Outcomes in Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Matched Comparative Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.外侧关节外手术增强对青少年前交叉韧带再撕裂风险和 Tegner 活动量表结果的影响:一项至少 2 年随访的匹配对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):892-901. doi: 10.1177/03635465231223703. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Criterion Based Rehabilitation Protocol for ACL Repair with Internal Brace Augmentation.基于标准的内支撑增强前交叉韧带修复康复方案
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;16(3):870-878. doi: 10.26603/001c.22217.
2
Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.研究方案:一项单盲、多中心、随机对照试验,比较急性前交叉韧带撕裂患者的动态关节内稳定、内部支具韧带增强和重建:LIBRƎ 研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 18;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2926-0.
3
Suture Augmented Versus Standard Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Comparative Analysis.
缝线增强与标准前交叉韧带重建:一项匹配的对比分析。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):2114-2122. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.054. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
4
MRI following primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.MRI 检查(磁共振成像检查)在前交叉韧带初次修复后的应用。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Aug;74(8):649.e1-649.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: incidence, outcome, and risk factors.前交叉韧带重建术后深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞:发生率、结局和危险因素。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1):34-40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0646.R1.
6
Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up.非手术治疗 ACL 损伤与 20 多年随访的主观和客观结果相反。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2665-2671. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5296-5. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Epidemiology of Recurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Sports: The Injury Surveillance Program, 2004-2014.美国国家大学生体育协会体育赛事中前交叉韧带复发性损伤的流行病学研究:2004 - 2014年损伤监测项目
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 13;6(6):2325967118777823. doi: 10.1177/2325967118777823. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement of Small and Standard Diameter Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Full Construct Model.独立缝合带增强小直径和标准直径移植物在前交叉韧带重建中的生物力学全构建模型。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):490-499. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Performance-Based Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Athletes Differ Between Sports.职业运动员前交叉韧带重建术后基于表现的结果因运动项目而异。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;45(10):2226-2232. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704834. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Return to Play and Patient Satisfaction After ACL Reconstruction: Study with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.前交叉韧带重建术后的重返运动及患者满意度:至少2年随访研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):720-725. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00958.