Liang Jiaming, Mesplède Thibault, Oliveira Maureen, Anstett Kaitlin, Wainberg Mark A
McGill University AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Division of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
McGill University AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Virol. 2015 Nov;89(22):11269-74. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01881-15. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
The R263K substitution in integrase has been selected in tissue culture with dolutegravir (DTG) and has been reported for several treatment-experienced individuals receiving DTG as part of salvage therapy. The R263K substitution seems to be incompatible with the presence of common resistance mutations associated with raltegravir (RAL), a different integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). T66I is a substitution that is common in individuals who have developed resistance against a different INSTI termed elvitegravir (EVG), but it is not known whether these two mutations might be compatible in the context of resistance against DTG or what impact the combination of these substitutions might have on resistance against INSTIs. E138K is a common secondary substitution observed with various primary resistance substitutions in RAL- and EVG-treated individuals. Viral infectivity, replicative capacity, and resistance against INSTIs were measured in cell-based assays. Strand transfer and 3' processing activities were measured biochemically. The combination of the R263K and T66I substitutions decreased HIV-1 infectivity, replicative capacity, and strand transfer activity. The addition of the E138K substitution partially compensated for these deficits and resulted in high levels of resistance against EVG but not against DTG or RAL. These findings suggest that the presence of the T66I substitution will not compromise the activity of DTG and may also help to prevent the additional generation of the R263K mutation. Our observations support the use of DTG in second-line therapy for individuals who experience treatment failure with EVG due to the T66I substitution.
The integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) elvitegravir and dolutegravir are newly developed inhibitors against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). HIV drug-resistant mutations in integrase that can arise in individuals treated with elvitegravir commonly include the T66I substitution, whereas R263K is a signature resistance substitution against dolutegravir. In order to determine how different combinations of integrase resistance mutations can influence the outcome of therapy, we report here the effects of the T66I, E138K, and R263K substitutions, alone and in combination, on viral replicative capacity and resistance to integrase inhibitors. Our results show that the addition of R263K to the T66I substitution diminishes viral replicative capacity and strand transfer activity while not compromising susceptibility to dolutegravir. This supports the use of dolutegravir in second-line therapy for patients failing elvitegravir therapy who harbor the T66I resistance substitution.
整合酶中的R263K替换是在使用多替拉韦(DTG)的组织培养中筛选出来的,并且已有报道称,在接受DTG作为挽救治疗一部分的多个经治个体中出现了这种替换。R263K替换似乎与raltegravir(RAL,另一种整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTI))相关的常见耐药突变不相容。T66I是在对另一种INSTI(elvitegravir,EVG)产生耐药性的个体中常见的一种替换,但尚不清楚这两种突变在对DTG耐药的情况下是否可能相容,或者这些替换的组合对INSTIs耐药性可能有何影响。E138K是在接受RAL和EVG治疗的个体中与各种主要耐药替换一起观察到的常见次要替换。在基于细胞的试验中测量了病毒感染性、复制能力和对INSTIs的耐药性。通过生化方法测量了链转移和3'加工活性。R263K和T66I替换的组合降低了HIV-1的感染性、复制能力和链转移活性。添加E138K替换部分补偿了这些缺陷,并导致对EVG的高水平耐药,但对DTG或RAL没有耐药。这些发现表明,T66I替换的存在不会损害DTG的活性,还可能有助于防止R263K突变的额外产生。我们的观察结果支持在因T66I替换导致EVG治疗失败的个体的二线治疗中使用DTG。
整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTIs)elvitegravir和多替拉韦是新开发的针对1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)的抑制剂。在用elvitegravir治疗的个体中可能出现的整合酶中的HIV耐药突变通常包括T66I替换,而R263K是针对多替拉韦的标志性耐药替换。为了确定整合酶耐药突变的不同组合如何影响治疗结果,我们在此报告T66I、E138K和R263K替换单独及组合对病毒复制能力和对整合酶抑制剂耐药性的影响。我们的结果表明,在T66I替换中添加R263K会降低病毒复制能力和链转移活性,同时不影响对多替拉韦的敏感性。这支持在因T66I耐药替换导致elvitegravir治疗失败的患者的二线治疗中使用多替拉韦。