• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年与非老年严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克复苏患者生存情况的对比分析

Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients.

作者信息

Palomba Henrique, Corrêa Thiago Domingos, Silva Eliézer, Pardini Andreia, Assuncao Murillo Santucci Cesar de

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Jul-Sep;13(3):357-63. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313
PMID:26313436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4943779/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and March 2012.

RESULTS

Elderly patients accounted for 62.6% (531/848) and non-elderly patients for 37.4% (317/848). Elderly patients had a higher APACHE II score [22 (18-28)versus 19 (15-24); p<0.001], compared to non-elderly patients, although the number of organ dysfunctions did not differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between elderly and non-elderly patients. The length of hospital stay was higher in elderly compared to non-elderly patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock [18 (10-41)versus 14 (8-29) days, respectively; p=0.0001]. Predictors of death among elderly patients included age, site of diagnosis, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors.

CONCLUSION

In this study population early resuscitation of elderly patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies addressing the long-term impact on functional status and quality of life are necessary.

摘要

目的

比较老年(≥65岁)与非老年(<65岁)复苏的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的预后,并确定老年患者的死亡预测因素。

方法

回顾性队列研究,纳入2006年1月至2012年3月间入住重症监护病房的848例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者。

结果

老年患者占62.6%(531/848),非老年患者占37.4%(317/848)。与非老年患者相比,老年患者的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分更高[22(18 - 28)对19(15 - 24);p<0.001],尽管两组间器官功能障碍的数量无差异。老年与非老年患者的28天和住院死亡率无显著差异。与因严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克入院的非老年患者相比,老年患者的住院时间更长[分别为18(10 - 41)天对14(8 - 29)天;p = 0.0001]。老年患者的死亡预测因素包括年龄、诊断部位、APACHE II评分、机械通气需求和血管升压药需求。

结论

在本研究人群中,老年患者的早期复苏与住院死亡率增加无关。有必要进行前瞻性研究以探讨对功能状态和生活质量的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients.老年与非老年严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克复苏患者生存情况的对比分析
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Jul-Sep;13(3):357-63. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
2
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
3
Comparison of Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis in patients meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle.比较符合早期目标导向治疗和严重脓毒症复苏包标准的急诊脓毒症患者的易感性、损伤/感染、反应和器官功能障碍、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 以及死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
4
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
Severe sepsis and its impact on outcome in elderly and very elderly patients admitted in intensive care unit.严重脓毒症及其对入住重症监护病房的老年和非常老年患者预后的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):179-83. doi: 10.1177/0885066610397116. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
Clinical management for patients admitted to a critical care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock.重症监护病房收治的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的临床管理。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Dec;31(6):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
9
Outcomes associated with conventional management of severe sepsis at Damas Hospital.大马士革医院严重脓毒症传统治疗的相关结果。
Bol Asoc Med P R. 2011 Apr-Jun;103(2):35-8.
10
Patient survival, predictive factors and disease course of severe sepsis in Czech intensive care units: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study.捷克重症监护病房中严重脓毒症患者的生存情况、预测因素及疾病进程:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Jun;160(2):287-97. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.052. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-dependent differences in the association between blood interleukin-6 levels and mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective observational study.脓毒症患者血液白细胞介素-6水平与死亡率之间关联的年龄依赖性差异:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 13;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00775-1.
2
Usage of Meropenem Continuous Infusion for Treatment of Infectious Complications in Orthopedic Elderly Patients with Anemia: A Case Series.美罗培南持续输注在老年骨科贫血患者感染并发症治疗中的应用:病例系列。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 2;60(6):929. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060929.
3
Analysis of trends in sepsis mortality in Brazil and by regions from 2010 to 2019.巴西 2010 年至 2019 年脓毒症死亡率趋势分析及地区分布
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Apr 22;56:25. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003789. eCollection 2022.
4
Metabolomics Coupled with Transcriptomics Approach Deciphering Age Relevance in Sepsis.代谢组学与转录组学方法相结合解析脓毒症中的年龄相关性
Aging Dis. 2019 Aug 1;10(4):854-870. doi: 10.14336/AD.2018.1027. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者液体复苏的评估和预测因素。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1582-1590. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003960.
6
Difference between elderly and non-elderly patients in using serum lactate level to predict mortality caused by sepsis in the emergency department.急诊科老年与非老年患者使用血清乳酸水平预测脓毒症所致死亡率的差异
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0209. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010209.
7
The endotoxemia cardiac dysfunction is attenuated by AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway regulating autophagy.AMPK/mTOR信号通路通过调节自噬减轻内毒素血症引起的心脏功能障碍。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Oct 21;492(3):520-527. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.034. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Blood Lactate Levels Cutoff and Mortality Prediction in Sepsis-Time for a Reappraisal? a Retrospective Cohort Study.脓毒症中血乳酸水平临界值与死亡率预测——是时候重新评估了?一项回顾性队列研究
Shock. 2016 Nov;46(5):480-485. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000667.
9
Role of TFEB Mediated Autophagy, Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Cell Death in Endotoxin Induced Myocardial Toxicity of Young and Aged Mice.TFEB介导的自噬、氧化应激、炎症和细胞死亡在脂多糖诱导的年轻和老年小鼠心肌毒性中的作用
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:5380319. doi: 10.1155/2016/5380319. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit.评估全球危重病负担:国际重症监护病房调查 (ICON) 审计。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 May;2(5):380-6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Long-term mortality after community-acquired sepsis: a longitudinal population-based cohort study.社区获得性脓毒症后的长期死亡率:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 17;4(1):e004283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004283.
3
Outcome of elderly patients with circulatory failure.老年循环衰竭患者的转归。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jan;40(1):50-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3121-7. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Severe sepsis and septic shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623.
5
Predictors of long-term mortality after severe sepsis in the elderly.老年人严重脓毒症后长期死亡率的预测因素。
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Apr;347(4):282-8. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318295a147.
6
Frailty in older adults: implications for end-of-life care.老年人的虚弱:对临终关怀的影响。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2013 Mar;80(3):168-74. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.80a.12100.
7
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
8
Severe sepsis and its impact on outcome in elderly and very elderly patients admitted in intensive care unit.严重脓毒症及其对入住重症监护病房的老年和非常老年患者预后的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):179-83. doi: 10.1177/0885066610397116. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
9
Frailty in the critically ill: a novel concept.危重症患者的衰弱:一个新概念。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):301. doi: 10.1186/cc9297. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
10
The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis.合并症和年龄对脓毒症患者住院死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Oct 15.