• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构中居民久坐生活方式的社会组织。

The social organization of a sedentary life for residents in long-term care.

作者信息

Benjamin Kathleen, Rankin Janet, Edwards Nancy, Ploeg Jenny, Legault Frances

机构信息

University of Calgary in Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2016 Jun;23(2):128-37. doi: 10.1111/nin.12120. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1111/nin.12120
PMID:26314937
Abstract

Worldwide, the literature reports that many residents in long-term care (LTC) homes are sedentary. In Canada, personal support workers (PSWs) provide most of the direct care in LTC homes and could play a key role in promoting activity for residents. The purpose of this institutional ethnographic study was to uncover the social organization of LTC work and to discover how this organization influenced the physical activity of residents. Data were collected in two LTC homes in Ontario, Canada through participant observations with PSWs and interviews with people within and external to the homes. Findings explicate the links between meals, lifts and transfers, and the LTC standards to reveal that physical activity is considered an add-on program in the purview of physiotherapists. Some of the LTC standards which are intended to product good outcomes for residents actually disrupt the work of PSWs making it difficult for them to respond to the physical activity needs of residents. This descriptive ethnographic account is an important first step in trying to find a solution to optimize real activities of daily living into life in LTC.

摘要

在全球范围内,文献报道称许多长期护理(LTC)机构中的居民久坐不动。在加拿大,个人支持工作者(PSW)在长期护理机构中提供大部分直接护理,并且在促进居民活动方面可以发挥关键作用。这项机构民族志研究的目的是揭示长期护理工作的社会组织,并发现这种组织如何影响居民的身体活动。通过与个人支持工作者进行参与观察以及对机构内部和外部人员进行访谈,在加拿大安大略省的两家长期护理机构收集了数据。研究结果阐明了用餐、升降和转移与长期护理标准之间的联系,以揭示身体活动在物理治疗师的职责范围内被视为一个附加项目。一些旨在为居民带来良好结果的长期护理标准实际上干扰了个人支持工作者的工作,使他们难以满足居民的身体活动需求。这种描述性民族志记录是试图找到解决方案以将实际日常生活活动优化到长期护理生活中的重要第一步。

相似文献

1
The social organization of a sedentary life for residents in long-term care.长期护理机构中居民久坐生活方式的社会组织。
Nurs Inq. 2016 Jun;23(2):128-37. doi: 10.1111/nin.12120. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
"Here for the residents": a case study of cultural competence of personal support workers in a long-term care home.“为居民而来”:长期护理院中个人护理员文化能力的案例研究
J Transcult Nurs. 2015 Mar;26(2):146-56. doi: 10.1177/1043659614545401. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
3
Building capacity in palliative care for personal support workers in long-term care through experiential learning.通过体验式学习,为长期护理中的个人支持工作者提供临终关怀方面的能力建设。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Jun;9(2):151-8. doi: 10.1111/opn.12008. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
4
Making tradeoffs between the reasons to leave and reasons to stay employed in long-term care homes: perspectives of licensed nursing staff.权衡长期护理院离职和留职的原因:持照护理人员的观点。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jun;51(6):917-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
5
What are the differences among occupational groups related to their palliative care-specific educational needs and intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care homes?职业群体之间在姑息治疗特定教育需求和长期护理院跨专业合作强度方面有哪些差异?
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 18;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0207-y.
6
Moral imagination in long-term care workers.长期护理工作者的道德想象力。
Omega (Westport). 2004;49(4):299-320. doi: 10.2190/J7FV-1B8Y-MCNU-AMDW.
7
"Small" things matter: residents' involvement in practice improvements in long-term care facilities.“小”事至关重要:长期护理机构中居民参与实践改进
J Aging Stud. 2014 Dec;31:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
8
Structures, tensions, and processes shaping long-term care home staff's role in end of life decision-making for residents with dementia.结构、紧张局势和过程塑造了长期护理院工作人员在痴呆症居民临终决策中的角色。
J Aging Stud. 2020 Sep;54:100874. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100874. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Effects of resistance training on body composition and functional capacity among sarcopenic obese residents in long-term care facilities: a preliminary study.抗阻训练对长期照护机构中肥胖型肌少症居民身体成分和功能能力的影响:一项初步研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 22;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0714-6.
10
Supporting the "hallway residents": a qualitative descriptive study of staff perspectives on implementing the Namaste Care intervention in long-term care.支持“走廊居民”:一项关于工作人员对长期护理中实施 Namaste 护理干预看法的定性描述性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04360-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Social Organization of Quality of Life of Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Institutional Ethnography Approach.长期护理机构中老年人生活质量的社会组织:一种制度民族志方法。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Mar 12;12:23333936251324267. doi: 10.1177/23333936251324267. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
A 10-step participatory program for developing, implementing, and evaluating physical activity promoting actions in nursing homes in Germany.10 步参与式计划,用于在德国养老院制定、实施和评估促进身体活动的措施。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17727-3.
3
Patterns of physical activity among nursing home residents before and during the Covid 19 pandemic-a systematic observation.
新冠疫情之前及期间养老院居民的身体活动模式——一项系统观察
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Dec 6;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00332-5.
4
Effects of Exergaming on Physical and Cognitive Outcomes of Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Homes: A Systematic Review.安老院居住的老年人的运动游戏对身体和认知结果的影响:系统评价。
Gerontology. 2022;68(9):1044-1060. doi: 10.1159/000521832. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
5
Exergaming Platform for Older Adults Residing in Long-Term Care Homes: User-Centered Design, Development, and Usability Study.针对长期护理机构中老年人的运动游戏平台:以用户为中心的设计、开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Mar 9;9(1):e22370. doi: 10.2196/22370.
6
Influencing everyday activities in a nursing home setting: A call for ethical and responsive engagement.影响养老院环境中的日常活动:呼吁进行符合伦理且积极响应的参与。
Nurs Inq. 2018 Apr;25(2):e12217. doi: 10.1111/nin.12217. Epub 2017 Aug 1.