Wass S V, de Barbaro K, Clackson K
Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Biol Psychol. 2015 Oct;111:26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
Tonic and phasic differences in peripheral autonomic nervous system (ANS) indicators strongly predict differences in attention and emotion regulation in developmental populations. However, virtually all previous research has been based on individual ANS measures, which poses a variety of conceptual and methodlogical challenges to comparing results across studies. Here we recorded heart rate, electrodermal activity (EDA), pupil size, head movement velocity and peripheral accelerometry concurrently while a cohort of 37 typical 12-month-old infants completed a mixed assessment battery lasting approximately 20 min per participant. We analysed covariation of these autonomic indices in three ways: first, tonic (baseline) arousal; second, co-variation in spontaneous (phasic) changes during testing; third, phasic co-variation relative to an external stimulus event. We found that heart rate, head velocity and peripheral accelerometry showed strong positive co-variation across all three analyses. EDA showed no co-variation in tonic activity levels but did show phasic positive co-variation with other measures, that appeared limited to sections of high but not low general arousal. Tonic pupil size showed significant positive covariation, but phasic pupil changes were inconsistent. We conclude that: (i) there is high covariation between autonomic indices in infants, but that EDA may only be sensitive at extreme arousal levels, (ii) that tonic pupil size covaries with other indices, but does not show predicted patterns of phasic change and (iii) that motor activity appears to be a good proxy measure of ANS activity. The strongest patterns of covariation were observed using epoch durations of 40s per epoch, although significant covariation between indices was also observed using shorter epochs (1 and 5s).
外周自主神经系统(ANS)指标的紧张性和相位性差异能有力地预测发育人群在注意力和情绪调节方面的差异。然而,几乎所有先前的研究都基于个体的ANS测量,这给跨研究比较结果带来了各种概念和方法上的挑战。在此,我们同时记录了37名典型的12个月大婴儿的心率、皮肤电活动(EDA)、瞳孔大小、头部运动速度和外周加速度,这些婴儿完成了一项混合评估测试,每位参与者的测试持续约20分钟。我们以三种方式分析了这些自主指标的协变:第一,紧张性(基线)唤醒;第二,测试期间自发(相位性)变化的协变;第三,相对于外部刺激事件的相位性协变。我们发现,心率、头部速度和外周加速度在所有三种分析中都呈现出强烈的正协变。EDA在紧张性活动水平上没有协变,但在相位性方面确实与其他测量呈现正协变,且这种协变似乎仅限于总体唤醒水平较高而非较低的部分。紧张性瞳孔大小呈现出显著的正协变,但相位性瞳孔变化并不一致。我们得出以下结论:(i)婴儿自主指标之间存在高度协变,但EDA可能仅在极端唤醒水平下敏感;(ii)紧张性瞳孔大小与其他指标协变,但未呈现出预测的相位性变化模式;(iii)运动活动似乎是ANS活动的一个良好替代指标。使用每个时段40秒的时段持续时间观察到最强的协变模式,不过使用更短的时段(1秒和5秒)也观察到了指标之间的显著协变。