Mason Andrew W, Lee Ronald D, Lee Sang-Hyop
University of Hawaii at Manoa; East-West Center - Research Program.
University of California, Berkeley - Department of Demography; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Int Soc Secur Rev. 2010 Jul;63(3-4):145-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2010.01373.x.
Upward intergenerational flows - from the working ages to old age - are increasing substantially in the advanced industrialized countries and are much larger than in developing countries. Population aging is the most important factor leading to this change. Thus, in the absence of a major demographic shift, e.g., a return to high fertility, an increase in upward flows is inevitable. Even so, three other important factors will influence the magnitudes of upward flows. First, labor income varies at older ages due to differences in average age at retirement, productivity, unemployment, and hours worked. Second, the age patterns of consumption at older ages vary primarily due to differences in spending on health. Third, spending on human capital, i.e., spending child health and education, varies. Human capital spending competes with spending on the elderly, but it also increases the productivity of subsequent generations of workers and the resources available to support consumption in old age. All contemporary societies rely on a variety of institutions and economic mechanisms to shift economic resources from the working ages to the dependent ages - the young and the old. Three institutions dominate intergenerational flows: governments which implement social security, education, and other public transfer programs; markets which are key to the accumulation of assets, e.g., funded pensions and housing; and families which provide economic support to children in all societies and to the elderly in many. The objectives of this paper are, first, to describe how population aging and other changes influence the direction and magnitude of intergenerational flows; and, second, to contrast the institutional approaches to intergenerational flows as they are practiced around the world. The paper relies extensively on National Transfer Accounts, a system for measuring economic flows across age in a manner consistent with the UN System of National Accounts. These accounts are currently being constructed by research teams located in 33 countries on six continents representing wide variations in the level of development, demographics, and policies regarding intergenerational transfers.
在发达工业化国家,代际向上流动(即从工作年龄流向老年阶段)正在大幅增加,且比发展中国家的规模大得多。人口老龄化是导致这一变化的最重要因素。因此,在没有重大人口结构转变(例如生育率回升)的情况下,代际向上流动的增加是不可避免的。即便如此,还有其他三个重要因素将影响代际向上流动的规模。首先,由于退休平均年龄、生产率、失业率和工作时长的差异,老年阶段的劳动收入各不相同。其次,老年阶段的消费年龄模式主要因健康支出的差异而有所不同。第三,人力资本支出,即儿童健康和教育支出,存在差异。人力资本支出与老年人支出相互竞争,但它也提高了后代工人的生产率以及老年阶段可用于支持消费的资源。所有当代社会都依靠各种制度和经济机制将经济资源从工作年龄群体转移到依赖年龄群体(年轻人和老年人)。有三种制度主导着代际流动:实施社会保障、教育和其他公共转移项目的政府;对资产积累至关重要的市场,如有基金的养老金和住房市场;以及在所有社会中都为儿童、在许多社会中也为老年人提供经济支持的家庭。本文的目标,一是描述人口老龄化和其他变化如何影响代际流动的方向和规模;二是对比世界各地在代际流动方面所采用的制度方法。本文广泛依赖国民转移账户,这是一种以与联合国国民账户体系一致的方式衡量各年龄段经济流动的系统。目前,六大洲33个国家的研究团队正在构建这些账户,这些国家在发展水平、人口结构和代际转移政策方面存在广泛差异。