University of Iowa, Department of Rehabilitation and Counselor Education, N372 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Texas Woman's University, Department of Family Sciences, P.O. Box 425769, Denton, TX 76204, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
This study tested the inclusion of allostatic load as an expansion of the biobehavioral reactivity measurement in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health which proposes biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity.
Data for this study included a subsample of n = 1255 single and married, English-speaking adult participants (57% female, M age = 56 years) from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), a nationally representative epidemiological study of health and aging in the United States. Participants completed self-reported measures of family and marital functioning, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, number of prescribed medications, and a biological protocol in which the following indices were obtained: cardiovascular functioning, sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activity, inflammation, lipid/fat metabolism, and glucose metabolism.
Structural equation modeling indicated good fit of the data to the hypothesized family model (χ (2) = 125.13 p = .00, SRMR = .03, CFI = .96, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .04) and hypothesized couple model (χ(2) = 132.67, p = .00, SRMR = .04, CFI = .95, TLI = .93, RMSEA = .04). Negative family interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity for anxiety and depression and allostatic load; however couple interactions predicted only depression and anxiety measures of biobehavioral reactivity.
Findings suggest the importance of incorporating physiological data in measuring biobehavioral reactivity as a predicting factor in the overall BBFM model.
本研究测试了将压力负荷作为生物行为反应测量的扩展纳入生物行为家庭模型(BBFM)的情况。BBFM 是一种生物心理社会方法,用于研究健康问题,它提出生物行为反应(焦虑和抑郁)介导了家庭情绪氛围与疾病活动之间的关系。
本研究的数据包括来自美国全国中年发展调查(MIDUS II)的 n = 1255 名单身和已婚、讲英语的成年参与者(57%为女性,M 年龄= 56 岁)的子样本,这是一项针对美国健康和老龄化的全国代表性流行病学研究。参与者完成了家庭和婚姻功能、焦虑和抑郁(生物行为反应)、慢性健康状况数量、处方药数量以及生物学方案的自我报告测量,在生物学方案中获得了以下指数:心血管功能、交感和副交感神经系统活动、下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴活动、炎症、脂质/脂肪代谢和葡萄糖代谢。
结构方程模型表明,数据与假设的家庭模型(χ(2) = 125.13,p =.00,SRMR =.03,CFI =.96,TLI =.94,RMSEA =.04)和假设的夫妻模型(χ(2) = 132.67,p =.00,SRMR =.04,CFI =.95,TLI =.93,RMSEA =.04)拟合良好。负面的家庭互动预测了焦虑和抑郁的生物行为反应以及压力负荷;然而,夫妻互动仅预测了生物行为反应的抑郁和焦虑测量。
研究结果表明,在测量生物行为反应时,将生理数据纳入其中作为 BBFM 模型整体的预测因素非常重要。