Ungar Nadine, Michalowski Victoria I, Baehring Stella, Pauly Theresa, Gerstorf Denis, Ashe Maureen C, Madden Kenneth M, Hoppmann Christiane A
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:623037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623037. eCollection 2021.
Older adults often have long-term relationships, and many of their goals are intertwined with their respective partners. Joint goals can help or hinder goal progress. Little is known about how accurately older adults assess if a goal is joint, the role of over-reporting in these perceptions, and how joint goals and over-reporting may relate to older partners' relationship satisfaction and physical health (operationally defined as allostatic load). Two-hundred-thirty-six older adults from 118 couples (50% female; = 71 years) listed their three most important goals and whether they thought of them as goals they had in common with and wanted to achieve together with their partner (self-reported joint goals). Two independent raters classified goals as "joint" if both partners independently listed open-ended goals of the same content. Goal progress and relationship satisfaction were assessed 1 week later. Allostatic load was calculated using nine different biomarkers. Results show that 85% self-reported at least one goal as joint. Over-reporting- the perception that a goal was joint when in fact it was not mentioned among the three most salient goals of the spouse - occurred in one-third of all goals. Multilevel models indicate that the number of externally-rated joint goals was related to greater goal progress and lower allostatic load, but only for adults with little over-reporting. More joint goals and higher over-reporting were each linked with more relationship satisfaction. In conclusion, joint goals are associated with goal progress, relationship satisfaction, and health, but the association is dependent on the domain of functioning.
老年人通常拥有长期关系,他们的许多目标与各自的伴侣相互交织。共同目标可能有助于或阻碍目标的进展。对于老年人如何准确评估一个目标是否是共同目标、过度报告在这些认知中的作用,以及共同目标和过度报告如何与老年伴侣的关系满意度和身体健康(在操作上定义为应激负荷)相关,我们知之甚少。来自118对夫妻的236名老年人(50%为女性;平均年龄 = 71岁)列出了他们三个最重要的目标,以及他们是否认为这些目标是他们与伴侣共同拥有并希望一起实现的目标(自我报告的共同目标)。如果双方伴侣都独立列出了相同内容的开放式目标,两名独立的评估者将这些目标归类为“共同目标”。1周后评估目标进展和关系满意度。使用九种不同的生物标志物计算应激负荷。结果显示,85%的人自我报告至少有一个目标是共同目标。过度报告——即认为一个目标是共同目标,而实际上在配偶的三个最突出目标中并未提及——在所有目标中占三分之一。多层次模型表明,外部评定的共同目标数量与更大的目标进展和更低的应激负荷相关,但仅适用于过度报告较少的成年人。更多的共同目标和更高的过度报告都与更高的关系满意度相关。总之,共同目标与目标进展、关系满意度和健康相关,但这种关联取决于功能领域。