Kho Michelle E, Martin Robert A, Toonstra Amy L, Zanni Jennifer M, Mantheiy Earl C, Nelliot Archana, Needham Dale M
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7.
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1419.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of in-bed cycle ergometry as part of routine intensive care unit (ICU) physical therapist (PT) practice.
Between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, we prospectively identified all patients admitted to a 16-bed medical ICU receiving cycling by a PT, prospectively collected data on 12 different potential safety events, and retrospectively conducted a chart review to obtain specific details of each cycling session.
Six hundred eighty-eight patients received PT interventions, and 181 (26%) received a total of 541 cycling sessions (median [interquartile range {IQR}] cycling sessions per patient, 2 [1-4]). Patients' mean (SD) age was 57 (17) years, and 103 (57%) were male. The median (IQR) time from medical ICU admission to first PT intervention and first cycling session was 2 (1-4) and 4 (2-6) days, respectively, with a median (IQR) cycling session duration of 25 (18-30) minutes. On cycling days, the proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation, vasopressor infusions, and continuous renal replacement therapy was 80%, 8%, and 7%, respectively. A single safety event occurred, yielding a 0.2% event rate (95% upper confidence limit, 1.0%).
Use of in-bed cycling as part of routine PT interventions in ICU patients is feasible and appears safe. Further study of the potential benefits of early in-bed cycling is needed.
评估在床周期测力计作为重症监护病房(ICU)物理治疗师(PT)常规实践一部分的可行性和安全性。
在2010年7月1日至2011年12月31日期间,我们前瞻性地确定了所有入住拥有16张床位的内科ICU并接受PT进行周期测力计训练的患者,前瞻性地收集了12种不同潜在安全事件的数据,并回顾性地进行了图表审查以获取每次周期测力计训练的具体细节。
688例患者接受了PT干预,其中181例(26%)共接受了541次周期测力计训练(每位患者的周期测力计训练次数中位数[四分位间距{IQR}]为2[1-4])。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为57(17)岁,103例(57%)为男性。从入住内科ICU到首次PT干预和首次周期测力计训练的时间中位数(IQR)分别为2(1-4)天和4(2-6)天,周期测力计训练的持续时间中位数(IQR)为25(18-30)分钟。在进行周期测力计训练的日子里,接受机械通气、血管升压药输注和持续肾脏替代治疗的患者比例分别为80%、8%和7%。发生了1起安全事件,事件发生率为0.2%(95%置信上限,1.0%)。
在ICU患者中使用床旁周期测力计训练作为常规PT干预的一部分是可行的,且似乎是安全的。需要进一步研究早期床旁周期测力计训练的潜在益处。