Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房内进行床上骑行康复训练的可行性与安全性。

Feasibility and safety of in-bed cycling for physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Kho Michelle E, Martin Robert A, Toonstra Amy L, Zanni Jennifer M, Mantheiy Earl C, Nelliot Archana, Needham Dale M

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7.

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1419.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of in-bed cycle ergometry as part of routine intensive care unit (ICU) physical therapist (PT) practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, we prospectively identified all patients admitted to a 16-bed medical ICU receiving cycling by a PT, prospectively collected data on 12 different potential safety events, and retrospectively conducted a chart review to obtain specific details of each cycling session.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-eight patients received PT interventions, and 181 (26%) received a total of 541 cycling sessions (median [interquartile range {IQR}] cycling sessions per patient, 2 [1-4]). Patients' mean (SD) age was 57 (17) years, and 103 (57%) were male. The median (IQR) time from medical ICU admission to first PT intervention and first cycling session was 2 (1-4) and 4 (2-6) days, respectively, with a median (IQR) cycling session duration of 25 (18-30) minutes. On cycling days, the proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation, vasopressor infusions, and continuous renal replacement therapy was 80%, 8%, and 7%, respectively. A single safety event occurred, yielding a 0.2% event rate (95% upper confidence limit, 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of in-bed cycling as part of routine PT interventions in ICU patients is feasible and appears safe. Further study of the potential benefits of early in-bed cycling is needed.

摘要

目的

评估在床周期测力计作为重症监护病房(ICU)物理治疗师(PT)常规实践一部分的可行性和安全性。

材料与方法

在2010年7月1日至2011年12月31日期间,我们前瞻性地确定了所有入住拥有16张床位的内科ICU并接受PT进行周期测力计训练的患者,前瞻性地收集了12种不同潜在安全事件的数据,并回顾性地进行了图表审查以获取每次周期测力计训练的具体细节。

结果

688例患者接受了PT干预,其中181例(26%)共接受了541次周期测力计训练(每位患者的周期测力计训练次数中位数[四分位间距{IQR}]为2[1-4])。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为57(17)岁,103例(57%)为男性。从入住内科ICU到首次PT干预和首次周期测力计训练的时间中位数(IQR)分别为2(1-4)天和4(2-6)天,周期测力计训练的持续时间中位数(IQR)为25(18-30)分钟。在进行周期测力计训练的日子里,接受机械通气、血管升压药输注和持续肾脏替代治疗的患者比例分别为80%、8%和7%。发生了1起安全事件,事件发生率为0.2%(95%置信上限,1.0%)。

结论

在ICU患者中使用床旁周期测力计训练作为常规PT干预的一部分是可行的,且似乎是安全的。需要进一步研究早期床旁周期测力计训练的潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验