Suppr超能文献

一次性能源与腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术室时间:一项随机对照试验

Single-Use Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Holloran-Schwartz M Brigid, Gavard Jeffrey A, Martin Jared C, Blaskiewicz Robert J, Yeung Patrick P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.881. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the intraoperative direct costs of a single-use energy device with reusable energy devices during laparoscopic hysterectomy.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force Classification I).

SETTING

An academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-six women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from March 2013 to September 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

Each patient served as her own control. One side of the uterine attachments was desiccated and transected with the single-use device (Ligasure 5-mm Blunt Tip LF1537 with the Force Triad generator). The other side was desiccated and transected with reusable bipolar forceps (RoBi 5 mm), and transected with monopolar scissors using the same Covidien Force Triad generator. The instrument approach used was randomized to the attending physician who was always on the patient's left side. Resident physicians always operated on the patient's right side and used the converse instruments of the attending physician.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Start time was recorded at the utero-ovarian pedicle and end time was recorded after transection of the uterine artery on the same side. Costs included the single-use device; amortized costs of the generator, reusable instruments, and cords; cleaning and packaging of reusable instruments; and disposal of the single-use device. Operating room time was $94.14/min. We estimated that our single use-device cost $630.14 and had a total time savings of 6.7 min per case, or 3.35 min per side, which could justify the expense of the device. The single-use energy device had significant median time savings (-4.7 min per side, p < .001) and total intraoperative direct cost savings ($254.16 per case).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-use energy device that both desiccates and cuts significantly reduced operating room time to justify its own cost, and it also reduced total intraoperative direct costs during laparoscopic hysterectomy in our institution. Operating room cost per minute varies between institutions and must be considered before generalizing our results.

摘要

研究目的

比较腹腔镜子宫切除术期间一次性能量设备与可重复使用能量设备的术中直接成本。

设计

一项随机对照试验(加拿大工作组分类I级)。

地点

一家学术医院。

患者

2013年3月至2013年9月期间接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的46名女性。

干预措施

每位患者均作为自身对照。子宫附件的一侧使用一次性设备(带有Force Triad发生器的Ligasure 5毫米钝头LF1537)进行干燥和横断。另一侧使用可重复使用的双极钳(RoBi 5毫米)进行干燥和横断,然后使用同一Covidien Force Triad发生器的单极剪刀进行横断。所采用的器械使用方式由始终站在患者左侧的主治医生随机分配。住院医生始终在患者右侧进行手术,并使用与主治医生相反的器械。

测量指标及主要结果

记录子宫卵巢蒂的开始时间,并在同一侧子宫动脉横断后记录结束时间。成本包括一次性设备;发生器、可重复使用器械和线缆的摊销成本;可重复使用器械的清洁和包装;以及一次性设备的处置。手术室时间成本为每分钟94.14美元。我们估计一次性设备成本为630.14美元,每例节省总时间6.7分钟,即每侧节省3.35分钟,这可以证明该设备的费用是合理的。一次性能量设备每侧中位时间显著节省(-4.7分钟,p <.001),术中直接总成本节省(每例254.16美元)。

结论

一种兼具干燥和切割功能的一次性能量设备显著缩短了手术室时间,证明其成本合理,并且在我们机构的腹腔镜子宫切除术期间还降低了术中直接总成本。各机构之间每分钟的手术室成本有所不同,在推广我们的结果之前必须予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验