Smyth Nina, Thorn Lisa, Hucklebridge Frank, Evans Phil, Clow Angela
Psychophysiology and Stress Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, UK.
Psychophysiology and Stress Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, UK.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Dec;62:200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
The cortisol awakening response (CAR) can be assessed from saliva samples collected at home, which confers ecological validity but lacks researcher oversight. Participant non-adherence to requested saliva sampling regimes leads to inaccurate CAR estimates. Moderate sampling delays of just 8 (5-15) min between awakening and commencement of saliva sampling are reported to result in over-estimated CAR magnitude and earlier peaking. This has been attributed to an observed 'latent' period in which cortisol secretion does not increase for up to 10-min after awakening. Replication of this finding is essential as the findings have considerable implications for CAR research. Healthy participants (n=26) collected saliva samples at 5-min intervals for 60min on 2 consecutive typical weekdays. Full electronic monitoring of awakening and sampling enabled exclusion of non-adherent data (i.e., delays of greater than 5min between awakening and collection of the first sample). In the 0-15min post awakening segment of the CAR a quadratic effect was observed, with no difference between the awakening and 5 and 10min samples. Moderate sampling delays will shift assessment of the CAR just sufficiently along the time axis to not impact upon measurement of the first sample but to remove the immediate post-awakening latent period from CAR estimates-whilst retaining later estimates of elevated cortisol secretion. The implication from these results is that accurate CAR measures can only be determined from data with strict adherence to commencement of saliva sampling following awakening.
皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)可通过在家采集的唾液样本进行评估,这具有生态学效度,但缺乏研究者监督。参与者不遵守要求的唾液采样方案会导致CAR估计不准确。据报道,在醒来和开始唾液采样之间仅延迟8(5 - 15)分钟的适度采样延迟会导致CAR幅度估计过高且峰值提前出现。这归因于观察到的“潜伏期”,即醒来后长达10分钟内皮质醇分泌不会增加。由于该发现对CAR研究有重大影响,因此重复这一发现至关重要。健康参与者(n = 26)在连续两个典型工作日每隔5分钟采集一次唾液样本,共采集60分钟。对醒来和采样进行全面电子监测,能够排除不依从数据(即醒来与采集第一个样本之间延迟超过5分钟)。在CAR醒来后的0 - 15分钟时间段内观察到二次效应,醒来时与5分钟和10分钟样本之间无差异。适度的采样延迟将使CAR的评估在时间轴上充分移动,从而不会影响第一个样本的测量,但会从CAR估计中消除醒来后的即时潜伏期,同时保留后期皮质醇分泌升高的估计值。这些结果表明,只有严格遵守醒来后开始唾液采样的数据才能确定准确的CAR测量值。