Anderson Travis, Wideman Laurie
University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.
Sports Med Open. 2017 Oct 10;3(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40798-017-0102-3.
The cortisol awakening response (CAR) has been used as a biomarker of stress response in a multitude of psychological investigations. While a myriad of biochemical responses have been proposed to monitor responses to exercise training, the use of CAR within the exercise and sports sciences is currently limited and is a potentially underutilized variable. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to collate studies that incorporate both exercise and CAR, in an effort to better understand (a) whether CAR is a useful marker for monitoring exercise stress and (b) how CAR may be most appropriately used in future research.
A systematic review of the literature was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted using PubMed, SportDISCUS, Scopus, and PsychInfo databases, using search terms related toCAR and exercise and physical activity.
10,292 articles were identified in the initial search, with 32 studies included in the final analysis. No studies investigated the effects of laboratory-controlled exercise on CAR. Variable effects were observed, possibly due to inconsistencies in study design, methodology, population, and CAR analysis. The available literature suggests a threshold of exercise may be required to alter the HPA axis and affect CAR. Moreover, CAR may represent a combination of previous exercise load and upcoming stress, making current interpretation of field-based observational research challenging.
More research is needed to fully elucidate the influence of exercise on CAR and address a number of gaps in the literature, including controlling exercise load, consistent sample collection, and CAR calculation and analysis.
在众多心理学研究中,皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)已被用作应激反应的生物标志物。虽然已经提出了无数的生化反应来监测对运动训练的反应,但CAR在运动和体育科学中的应用目前有限,且是一个可能未得到充分利用的变量。因此,本综述的目的是整理结合了运动和CAR的研究,以便更好地理解:(a)CAR是否是监测运动应激的有用标志物;(b)CAR在未来研究中如何能得到最恰当的应用。
按照PRISMA指南对文献进行系统综述。使用与CAR以及运动和身体活动相关的检索词,在PubMed、SportDISCUS、Scopus和PsychInfo数据库中进行检索。
在初始检索中识别出10292篇文章,最终分析纳入了32项研究。没有研究调查实验室控制的运动对CAR的影响。观察到了不同的效应,这可能是由于研究设计、方法、人群和CAR分析的不一致。现有文献表明,可能需要一定的运动阈值来改变下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴并影响CAR。此外,CAR可能代表了先前运动负荷和即将到来的应激的综合作用,这使得当前对基于现场的观察性研究的解读具有挑战性。
需要更多研究来充分阐明运动对CAR的影响,并填补文献中的一些空白,包括控制运动负荷、一致的样本采集以及CAR的计算和分析。