• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的比较。

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, GuangZhou, 510630, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, GuangZhou, 510630, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.037. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.037
PMID:26318966
Abstract

AIM

To explore the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data from 102 patients with right colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic CME (n = 53; LS group) and open CME (n = 49; OS group) from June 2012 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were no conversions to open surgery in the LS group. The operative time in the LS group was similar to that in the OS group (194 ± 57 vs. 177 ± 51 min, respectively, p = 0.118). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LS group compared with the OS group (94 ± 56 vs. 118 ± 60 ml, respectively, p = 0.039). There was no difference in the total number of harvested lymph nodes (14 ± 6 vs. 13 ± 5, respectively, p = 0.313). The time to resume liquid diet (3 ± 2 vs. 5 ± 2 d, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (11 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 6 d, p = 0.002) were significantly shorter in the LS group. The rate of complications was similar between the groups (4% vs. 12%, respectively, p = 0.222). No recurrences were noted in either group during follow-up (range, 6-24 months).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic CME is a safe, feasible, and effective minimally invasive procedure for right colon cancer.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜辅助完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗右半结肠癌的可行性、安全性、疗效和短期肿瘤学结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2012 年 6 月至 2013 年 12 月接受腹腔镜 CME(n = 53;LS 组)和开腹 CME(n = 49;OS 组)治疗的 102 例右半结肠癌患者的临床资料。比较两组患者的手术结果。

结果

LS 组无中转开腹手术。LS 组的手术时间与 OS 组相似(分别为 194 ± 57 分钟和 177 ± 51 分钟,p = 0.118)。LS 组术中出血量明显少于 OS 组(分别为 94 ± 56 毫升和 118 ± 60 毫升,p = 0.039)。两组淋巴结清扫总数无差异(分别为 14 ± 6 枚和 13 ± 5 枚,p = 0.313)。LS 组恢复液体饮食的时间(3 ± 2 天 vs. 5 ± 2 天,p < 0.001)和住院时间(11 ± 4 天 vs. 14 ± 6 天,p = 0.002)均明显缩短。两组并发症发生率相似(分别为 4%和 12%,p = 0.222)。随访期间两组均未发现复发(随访时间 6-24 个月)。

结论

腹腔镜 CME 是治疗右半结肠癌安全、可行、有效的微创方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的比较。
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.037. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中完整系膜切除与传统系膜切除的肿瘤学结局
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):E698-E702. doi: 10.1111/ans.14493. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for Right-sided Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study.腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗右半结肠癌的可行性和安全性:短期结果。一项随机临床研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004557.
4
[Efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer].腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的疗效评估
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):545-549.
5
Short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision and central ligation.腹腔镜与开放完全结肠系膜切除术及中央结扎术的短期和肿瘤学结局
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Is Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Feasible for Transverse Colon Cancer?机器人全结肠系膜切除术对横结肠癌是否可行?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1443-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0239. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted and open complete mesocolic excision (CME) for the treatment of transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开放全结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗横结肠癌的短期疗效比较。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;6(1):6. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.01.01.
8
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
9
Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的比较。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 2;2021:8859879. doi: 10.1155/2021/8859879. eCollection 2021.
10
Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis.腹腔镜下改良的结肠系膜整块切除术联合中央血管结扎术治疗右半结肠癌的短期和长期疗效优于开放手术,这在倾向评分分析中得到了证实。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2721-2731. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5970-6. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of chyle leakage between laparoscopic and open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放结肠癌切除术患者乳糜漏的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Aug;41(4):262-270. doi: 10.3393/ac.2025.00045.0006. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
2
[Anatomical variants of blood vessels and their surgical challenges related to oncological right hemicolectomy].[血管的解剖变异及其与肿瘤性右半结肠切除术相关的手术挑战]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02342-8.
3
Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision Offers Similar Results Compared with Open Surgery.
与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术联合完整结肠系膜切除术的效果相似。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 7;61(7):1231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071231.
4
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助与全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的疗效比较
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):100476. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.100476.
5
Comparison of different surgical techniques and anastomosis methods in short-term outcomes of right colon cancer: a network meta-analysis of open surgery, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis.不同手术技术和吻合方法对右结肠癌短期预后的比较:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术联合体外和体内吻合的网状Meta分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):309-325. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02096-2. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
6
Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术行右半结肠切除术:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):979-993. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02853-8. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer.复杂结直肠癌中央血管结扎完整结肠系膜切除术的疗效与可行性
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;14(2):312-317. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01673-w. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.根治性右半结肠切除术的淋巴结清扫术和完整结肠系膜切除术的定义和报告:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
9
Risk factors of chylous ascites and its relationship with long-term prognosis in laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer.右半结肠癌腹腔镜 D3 淋巴结清扫术后乳糜性腹水的危险因素及其与长期预后的关系。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2453-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02527-3. Epub 2022 May 20.
10
Laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective comparative study.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术联合中央血管结扎治疗右半结肠癌的回顾性对比研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jan;92(1-2):132-139. doi: 10.1111/ans.17264. Epub 2021 Oct 12.