Jeong Jin Hee, Kim Dong Hoon, Kim Seong Chun, Kang Changwoo, Lee Soo Hoon, Kang Tae-Sin, Lee Sang Bong, Jung Sang Min, Kim Dong Seob
Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.060. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been used to treat patients with dyspnea. We identified changes in arterial blood gas (ABG) of patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with hypercapnic and nonhypercapnic respiratory failure after use of an HFNC.
This study was a retrospective chart review of patients with respiratory failure who visited the hospital and used an HFNC in the ED. The study period was July 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients with Paco2 greater than 45 mm Hg before the HFNC ABG analyses were included in the hypercapnia group; others comprised the nonhypercapnia group. Primary outcomes were the changes in ABG before and after use of an HFNC in the hypercapnia and nonhypercapnia groups. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were also assessed.
A total of 173 patients were included after exclusion of 92 according to exclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (hypercapnia group, 46, and nonhypercapnia group, 35) were included. Paco2 significantly decreased among all patients after use of HFNC (from 54.7±26.4 mm Hg to 51.3±25.8 mm Hg; P=.02), but the reduction was significant only in the hypercapnia group (from 73.2±20.0 to 67.2±23.4; P=.02). Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar between the groups.
Use of an HFNC in patients with hypercapnia could show a significant trend of decrease in Paco2. Progression to noninvasive or invasive ventilation and mortality rates were similar in patients with and without hypercapnia.
高流量鼻导管(HFNC)已被用于治疗呼吸困难患者。我们确定了在急诊科(ED)使用HFNC后,因高碳酸血症性和非高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭就诊患者的动脉血气(ABG)变化。
本研究是对在医院就诊并在ED使用HFNC的呼吸衰竭患者进行的回顾性病历审查。研究期间为2011年7月1日至2013年12月31日。在进行HFNC ABG分析前动脉血二氧化碳分压(Paco2)大于45 mmHg的患者被纳入高碳酸血症组;其他患者组成非高碳酸血症组。主要结局是高碳酸血症组和非高碳酸血症组在使用HFNC前后ABG的变化。还评估了进展为无创或有创通气的情况以及死亡率。
根据排除标准排除92例患者后,共纳入173例患者。纳入81例患者(高碳酸血症组46例,非高碳酸血症组35例)。使用HFNC后,所有患者的Paco2均显著降低(从54.7±26.4 mmHg降至51.3±25.8 mmHg;P = 0.02),但仅在高碳酸血症组中降低显著(从73.2±20.0降至67.2±23.4;P = 0.02)。两组进展为无创或有创通气的情况以及死亡率相似。
在高碳酸血症患者中使用HFNC可显示出Paco2显著下降的趋势。有高碳酸血症和无高碳酸血症患者进展为无创或有创通气的情况以及死亡率相似。