Bruhn Allison L, Hirsch Shanna E, Lloyd John W
University of Iowa, N252 Lindquist Ctr, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
University of Virginia, PO Box 400273, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
J Prim Prev. 2015 Oct;36(5):335-49. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0400-9.
We assessed the reporting of treatment integrity in school-wide prevention programs in K-12 schools. This review was designed to determine (a) the extent to which treatment integrity was reported in school-wide prevention and intervention programs and how the reporting varied by research design, year, and journal; and (b) the procedures (e.g., method, frequency, informant) used to collect treatment integrity data. Results indicated that fewer than half of the studies in the review (n = 36, 45.6 %) measured and reported treatment integrity. Those studies reporting treatment integrity often used multiple methods and informants. Reporting treatment integrity in this body of literature has increased steadily over time.
我们评估了K-12学校全校预防项目中治疗完整性的报告情况。本综述旨在确定：（a）全校预防和干预项目中治疗完整性的报告程度，以及报告如何因研究设计、年份和期刊而异；（b）用于收集治疗完整性数据的程序（如方法、频率、信息提供者）。结果表明，该综述中的研究不到一半（n = 36，45.6%）测量并报告了治疗完整性。那些报告治疗完整性的研究通常使用多种方法和信息提供者。随着时间的推移，这一文献中的治疗完整性报告稳步增加。
