• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于大猩猩和人类婴儿中不存在实体的交流。

Communication about absent entities in great apes and human infants.

作者信息

Bohn Manuel, Call Josep, Tomasello Michael

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany.

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany; University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Dec;145:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.009
PMID:26319970
Abstract

There is currently debate about the extent to which non-linguistic beings such as human infants and great apes are capable of absent reference. In a series of experiments we investigated the flexibility and specificity of great apes' (N=36) and 12 month-old infants' (N=40) requests for absent entities. Subjects had the choice between requesting visible objects directly and using the former location of a depleted option to request more of these now-absent entities. Importantly, we systematically varied the quality of the present and absent options. We found that great apes as well as human infants flexibly adjusted their requests for absent entities to these contextual variations and only requested absent entities when the visible option was of lower quality than the absent option. These results suggest that the most basic cognitive capacities for absent reference do not depend on language and are shared by humans and their closest living relatives.

摘要

目前,关于人类婴儿和大猩猩等非语言生物能够进行缺席指称的程度存在争议。在一系列实验中,我们研究了大猩猩(N = 36)和12个月大婴儿(N = 40)对缺席实体请求的灵活性和特异性。受试者可以选择直接请求可见物体,也可以使用已耗尽选项的先前位置来请求更多这些现在缺席的实体。重要的是,我们系统地改变了当前和缺席选项的质量。我们发现,大猩猩和人类婴儿会根据这些情境变化灵活调整对缺席实体的请求,并且只有当可见选项的质量低于缺席选项时才会请求缺席实体。这些结果表明,进行缺席指称的最基本认知能力不依赖于语言,人类及其现存的近亲都具备。

相似文献

1
Communication about absent entities in great apes and human infants.关于大猩猩和人类婴儿中不存在实体的交流。
Cognition. 2015 Dec;145:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
The role of past interactions in great apes' communication about absent entities.过去的互动在大猩猩关于不存在实体的交流中的作用。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Nov;130(4):351-357. doi: 10.1037/com0000042. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
The social-cognitive basis of infants' reference to absent entities.婴儿对不在场实体的参照的社会认知基础。
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Gravity and solidity in four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus): vertical and horizontal variations of the table task.四种大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩)的重力与稳固性:台面任务的垂直与水平变化
J Comp Psychol. 2009 May;123(2):168-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013580.
5
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
6
Differences in the nonverbal requests of great apes and human infants.类人猿和人类婴儿在非言语请求上的差异。
Child Dev. 2014 Mar-Apr;85(2):444-55. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12141. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Prelinguistic infants, but not chimpanzees, communicate about absent entities.处于语言前阶段的婴儿能够就不存在的事物进行交流,但黑猩猩却不能。
Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):654-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02346.x.
8
The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).大型猿类(矮黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)禀赋效应的局限性
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45. doi: 10.1037/a0024516. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items?大猩猩能够从多个物品样本推断食物物品的总体情况吗?
Am J Primatol. 2017 Oct;79(10). doi: 10.1002/ajp.22693. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii).强化物之间的价值差异调节了大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)的选择性价值效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/com0000014. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Great ape interaction: Ladyginian but not Gricean.巨猿的互动:拉季gian 而非格莱斯ian。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2300243120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300243120. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Talking About the Absent and the Abstract: Referential Communication in Language and Gesture.论有无与虚实:语言与手势中的指称交际。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):978-992. doi: 10.1177/17456916231180589. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
The relevance of words and the language/communication divide.词汇的相关性以及语言/交流鸿沟。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1187343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187343. eCollection 2023.
4
Acquiring verbal reference: The interplay of cognitive, linguistic, and general learning capacities.获得口头参照:认知、语言和一般学习能力的相互作用。
Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Nov;65:101624. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101624. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
From social contingency to verbal reference: A constructivist hypothesis.从社会偶然事件到言语指代:一个建构主义假说。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Jul;129(4):890-909. doi: 10.1037/rev0000320. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Spontaneous (minimal) ritual in non-human great apes?非人类大型猿类的自发性(最小)仪式行为?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 17;375(1805):20190423. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0423. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Becoming human: human infants link language and cognition, but what about the other great apes?成为人类:人类婴儿将语言和认知联系起来,但其他大型类人猿呢?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20180408. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0408. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Time-space-displaced responses in the orangutan vocal system.在猩猩的发声系统中存在时空位移反应。
Sci Adv. 2018 Nov 14;4(11):eaau3401. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau3401. eCollection 2018 Nov.
9
Thirty years of great ape gestures.三十年的大猩猩手势研究
Anim Cogn. 2019 Jul;22(4):461-469. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1167-1. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
An Interactive View on the Development of Deictic Pointing in Infancy.关于婴儿期指示性指向发展的交互视角。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 2;8:1319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01319. eCollection 2017.