Analytical Laboratory of Restorative Biomaterials (LABiom-R), School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Mario Santos Braga, nº30, 3º andar Campus do Valonguinho, Centro, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 24.020-140, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1568-3. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
This study compared the influence of cement film thickness (CFT) on bond strength (BS) and fracture resistance (FR) of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts to root canal.
One hundred bovine incisors were used for BS and FR analysis (n = 10) and distributed into five experimental groups according to FRC post diameters (WhitePost DC no. 0.5, no. 1, no. 2, no. 3, no. 4), leading to five different CFTs. The canals were prepared using drill no. 4 provided by the post manufacturer and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl. After conditioning (24% H2O2/5 min) and silanization, posts were cemented with resin cement. BS was evaluated using push-out test and FR using the compression test at 45°. A stereomicroscope was used to measure CFT and to analyze failure pattern. BS data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Scheffé test for contrast (α = 0.05); FR data were subjected to one-way ANOVA.
BS was significantly affected by CFT, as the most well-adapted post achieved the highest values (p < 0.05). BS was similar for all root thirds. CFT did not affect fracture resistance. No root fractures were observed.
A FRC post well adapted to the root canal results in higher BS values. Different CFTs did not influence the FR of teeth restored with FRC posts.
The results indicate that post retention is improved when a well-adapted post is used, although this has not been critical to fracture resistance.
本研究比较了纤维增强复合材料(FRC)桩核在根管内的粘结强度(BS)和抗折强度(FR)受粘结剂膜厚度(CFT)的影响。
100 颗牛切牙用于 BS 和 FR 分析(n = 10),并根据 FRC 桩直径(WhitePost DC 0.5 号、1 号、2 号、3 号、4 号)分为 5 个实验组,导致 5 种不同的 CFT。使用制造商提供的 4 号钻预备根管,并使用 2.5% NaOCl 冲洗。根管处理(24% H2O2/5 分钟)和硅烷化后,使用树脂水泥粘结桩。使用推出试验评估 BS,使用 45°压缩试验评估 FR。使用立体显微镜测量 CFT 并分析失效模式。BS 数据采用双因素方差分析和 Scheffé 检验进行对比(α = 0.05);FR 数据采用单因素方差分析。
CFT 显著影响 BS,因为最适配的桩获得了最高的数值(p < 0.05)。所有根的第三部分 BS 相似。CFT 不影响抗折强度。未观察到根折。
与根管适配良好的 FRC 桩可获得较高的 BS 值。不同的 CFT 对用 FRC 桩修复的牙齿的 FR 没有影响。
结果表明,使用适配良好的桩可提高桩的固位力,尽管这对抗折强度没有影响。