Wilson Rose J, Paterson Pauline, Jarrett Caitlin, Larson Heidi J
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 25;33(47):6420-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.046. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Maternal vaccination has been evaluated and found to be extremely effective at preventing illness in pregnant women and new-borns; however, uptake of such programmes has been low in some areas. To analyse factors contributing to uptake of vaccines globally, a systematic review on vaccine hesitancy was carried out by The Vaccine Confidence Project in 2012. In order to further analyse factors contributing to uptake of maternal immunisation, a further search within the broader systematic review was conducted using the terms 'Pregnan*' or 'Matern*'. Forty-two articles were identified. Pregnancy-related articles were further screened to identify those focused on concerns, trust and access issues regarding maternal vaccination reported by pregnant women and healthcare workers. Thirty-five relevant articles were included which were then searched using the snowballing technique to identify additional relevant references cited in these articles. A search alert was also conducted from February to April 2015 in PubMed to ensure that no new relevant articles were missed. A total of 155 relevant articles were included. Most of the literature which was identified on hesitancy surrounding vaccination during pregnancy reports on determinants of influenza vaccine uptake in North America. Research conducted in low-income countries focused primarily on tetanus vaccine acceptance. The main barriers cited were related to vaccine safety, belief that vaccine not needed or effective, not recommended by healthcare worker, low knowledge about vaacines, access issues, cost, conflicting advice. From the point of view of healthcare workers, barriers included inadequate training, inadequate reimbursement and increased workload. Twenty-seven out of 46 (59%) articles mentioning ethnicity reported lower rates of coverage among ethnic minorities. Barriers to vaccination in pregnancy are complex and vary depending on context and population. There are wide gaps in knowledge regarding the attitudes of healthcare workers and how ethnicity and gender dynamics influence a pregnant woman's decision to vaccinate.
孕妇接种疫苗已得到评估,结果发现其在预防孕妇和新生儿疾病方面极为有效;然而,此类计划在某些地区的接受率一直很低。为了分析全球范围内影响疫苗接种接受率的因素,疫苗信心项目于2012年对疫苗犹豫进行了一项系统评价。为了进一步分析影响孕产妇免疫接种接受率的因素,在更广泛的系统评价中使用“Pregnan*”或“Matern*”进行了进一步检索。共确定了42篇文章。对与怀孕相关的文章进行了进一步筛选,以确定那些关注孕妇和医护人员报告的有关孕产妇疫苗接种的担忧、信任和可及性问题的文章。纳入了35篇相关文章,然后使用滚雪球技术对这些文章中引用的其他相关参考文献进行检索。2015年2月至4月还在PubMed上进行了搜索提醒,以确保没有遗漏新的相关文章。总共纳入了155篇相关文章。大多数关于孕期疫苗接种犹豫的文献报道的是北美流感疫苗接种率的决定因素。在低收入国家进行的研究主要集中在破伤风疫苗的接受情况。提到的主要障碍与疫苗安全性、认为疫苗不需要或无效、医护人员未推荐、对疫苗的了解不足、可及性问题、成本、相互矛盾的建议有关。从医护人员的角度来看,障碍包括培训不足、报销不足和工作量增加。在46篇提及种族的文章中,有27篇(59%)报告少数民族的覆盖率较低。孕期疫苗接种的障碍很复杂,因背景和人群而异。在医护人员的态度以及种族和性别动态如何影响孕妇的疫苗接种决定方面,存在很大的知识差距。