Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 203 Tor St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia(1).
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 203 Tor St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia(1).
Waste Manag. 2015 Dec;46:568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
With livestock manures being increasingly sought as alternatives to costly synthetic fertilisers, it is imperative that we understand and manage their associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here we provide the first dedicated assessment into how the GHG emitting potential of various manures responds to the different stages of the manure management continuum (e.g., from feed pen surface vs stockpiled). The research is important from the perspective of manure application to agricultural soils. Manures studied included: manure from beef feedpen surfaces and stockpiles; poultry broiler litter (8-week batch); fresh and composted egg layer litter; and fresh and composted piggery litter. Gases assessed were methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), the two principal agricultural GHGs. We employed proven protocols to determine the manures' ultimate CH4 producing potential. We also devised a novel incubation experiment to elucidate their N2O emitting potential; a measure for which no established methods exist. We found lower CH4 potentials in manures from later stages in their management sequence compared with earlier stages, but only by a factor of 0.65×. Moreover, for the beef manures this decrease was not significant (P<0.05). Nitrous oxide emission potential was significantly positively (P<0.05) correlated with C/N ratios yet showed no obvious relationship with manure management stage. Indeed, N2O emissions from the composted egg manure were considerably (13×) and significantly (P<0.05) higher than that of the fresh egg manure. Our study demonstrates that manures from all stages of the manure management continuum potentially entail significant GHG risk when applied to arable landscapes. Efforts to harness manure resources need to account for this.
随着牲畜粪便作为昂贵的合成肥料替代品的需求不断增加,我们必须了解和管理其相关的温室气体(GHG)排放。在这里,我们首次专门评估了各种粪便在粪便管理连续体的不同阶段(例如,从饲料栏表面到堆积)的 GHG 排放潜力如何变化。这项研究对于粪便施用于农业土壤的角度来看很重要。研究的粪便包括:来自牛饲料栏表面和堆积的粪便;家禽肉鸡垫料(8 周批次);新鲜和堆肥蛋鸡垫料;新鲜和堆肥猪粪。评估的气体是甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O),这两种主要的农业 GHG。我们采用经过验证的方案来确定粪便的最终 CH4 产生潜力。我们还设计了一种新颖的孵育实验来阐明它们的 N2O 排放潜力;对于这种措施,没有建立的方法。我们发现,与管理序列的早期阶段相比,管理序列后期的粪便中的 CH4 潜力较低,但仅低 0.65 倍。此外,对于牛肉粪便,这种降低并不显著(P<0.05)。氧化亚氮排放潜力与 C/N 比呈显著正相关(P<0.05),但与粪便管理阶段没有明显关系。事实上,堆肥蛋鸡粪便的 N2O 排放量比新鲜蛋鸡粪便高得多(13 倍)且显著(P<0.05)。我们的研究表明,当应用于耕地景观时,来自粪便管理连续体所有阶段的粪便都可能带来重大的 GHG 风险。利用粪便资源的努力需要考虑到这一点。