• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中人格障碍分类的混合模型:批判性分析

The hybrid model for the classification of personality disorders in DSM-5: a critical analysis.

作者信息

Esbec Enrique, Echeburúa Enrique

机构信息

Physician and Doctor in Psychology. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

CIBERSAM. School of Psychology. Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU).

出版信息

Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 Sep;43(5):177-86. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

PMID:26320896
Abstract

A personality disorder can be considered to be a generalized pattern of behaviors, cognitions, and emotions that is enduring, begins in adolescence or early adulthood, remains stable over time, and generates stress or psychological damage. The current focus on personality disorders (PDs) is found in Section II of DSM-5 and is unchanged compared to DSMIV, except that the PDs were removed from the former Axis II of the DSM-IV and included in the central classification of disorders. However, an alternative model for further study is presented in Section III that aims to address the deficiencies in the current categorical model of PDs. The underlying idea is that PDs are an extreme version of the personality traits that everyone has. According to this approach, PDs are characterized by impaired personality functioning (areas of identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and pathological personality factors (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism). The diagnostic categories derived from this model include only antisocial, avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, obsessive-compulsive, and schizotypal PDs. This hybrid approach to the diagnosis of PDs is complex and requires more empirical evidence before it can be incorporated into clinical practice. The proposals of the draft ICD-11 for PDs, which are based primarily on severity and dominant personality traits, are also included.

摘要

人格障碍可被视为一种普遍的行为、认知和情感模式,这种模式具有持久性,始于青春期或成年早期,随时间保持稳定,并会产生压力或心理损害。目前对人格障碍(PDs)的关注见于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的第二部分,与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)相比没有变化,只是人格障碍从DSM-IV原来的轴II中移除,并纳入了疾病的核心分类。然而,第三部分提出了一个供进一步研究的替代模型,旨在解决当前人格障碍分类模型中的缺陷。其基本观点是,人格障碍是每个人都有的人格特质的极端形式。根据这种方法,人格障碍的特征是人格功能受损(身份认同、自我导向、共情和亲密关系等方面)以及病理性人格因素(消极情感性、疏离、敌对、抑制解除和精神病性)。从这个模型得出的诊断类别仅包括反社会型、回避型、边缘型、自恋型、强迫型和分裂型人格障碍。这种人格障碍诊断的混合方法很复杂,在纳入临床实践之前需要更多的实证证据。国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)草案中关于人格障碍的提议也包括在内,这些提议主要基于严重程度和占主导地位的人格特质。

相似文献

1
The hybrid model for the classification of personality disorders in DSM-5: a critical analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中人格障碍分类的混合模型:批判性分析
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 Sep;43(5):177-86. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Do DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and Section III personality trait domains reflect the same genetic and environmental risk factors?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分的人格障碍和第三部分的人格特质领域是否反映相同的遗传和环境风险因素?
Psychol Med. 2017 Sep;47(12):2205-2215. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000824. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
3
Relating DSM-5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses.将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分的人格特质与第二部分的人格障碍诊断相关联。
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):647-55. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002226. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Evaluating the role of functional impairment in personality psychopathology.评估功能障碍在人格精神病理学中的作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.049. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
6
Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的个体DSM-IV标准的两年患病率及稳定性:迈向轴II障碍的混合模型
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):883-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.883.
7
Impairments in Cognitive and Emotional Empathy as Markers of General versus Specific Personality Pathology.作为一般与特定人格病理学指标的认知共情和情感共情损伤
Psychopathology. 2024;57(2):136-148. doi: 10.1159/000533861. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
[The dimensional-categorical hybrid model of personality disorders in DSM-5 from an adolescent psychiatric perspective - criticism and critical outlook].[从青少年精神病学视角看《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中人格障碍的维度-类别混合模型——批判与批判性展望]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2014 Jul;42(4):279-83. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000300.
10
An Empirical Evaluation of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders in Later Life.晚年人格障碍替代模型的实证评估。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;93(3):904-926. doi: 10.1177/0091415020980762. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Personality and Psychological Distress Using Natural Language Processing: A Study Protocol.使用自然语言处理预测人格和心理困扰:一项研究方案。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:865541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865541. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring associations between personality trait facets and emotional, psychological and social well-being in eating disorder patients.探讨人格特质方面与进食障碍患者情绪、心理和社会健康之间的关联。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Feb;27(1):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01107-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.