Suppr超能文献

在课堂上探索笛卡尔身心二元论的教学工具:哲学论证与神经科学错觉

Pedagogical tools to explore Cartesian mind-body dualism in the classroom: philosophical arguments and neuroscience illusions.

作者信息

Hamilton Scott, Hamilton Trevor J

机构信息

International Relations Department, London School of Economics and Political Science , London, UK.

Department of Psychology, MacEwan University , Edmonton, AB, Canada ; Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 10;6:1155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01155. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

A fundamental discussion in lower-level undergraduate neuroscience and psychology courses is Descartes's "radical" or "mind-body" dualism. According to Descartes, our thinking mind, the res cogitans, is separate from the body as physical matter or substance, the res extensa. Since the transmission of sensory stimuli from the body to the mind is a physical capacity shared with animals, it can be confused, misled, or uncertain (e.g., bodily senses imply that ice and water are different substances). True certainty thus arises from within the mind and its capacity to doubt physical stimuli. Since this doubting mind is a thinking thing that is distinct from bodily stimuli, truth and certainty are reached through the doubting mind as cogito ergo sum, or the certainty of itself as it thinks: hence Descartes's famous maxim, I think, therefore I am. However, in the last century of Western philosophy, with nervous system investigation, and with recent advances in neuroscience, the potential avenues to explore student's understanding of the epistemology and effects of Cartesian mind-body dualism has expanded. This article further explores this expansion, highlighting pedagogical practices and tools instructors can use to enhance a psychology student's understanding of Cartesian dualistic epistemology, in order to think more critically about its implicit assumptions and effects on learning. It does so in two ways: first, by offering instructors an alternative philosophical perspective to dualistic thinking: a mind-body holism that is antithetical to the assumed binaries of dualistic epistemology. Second, it supplements this philosophical argument with a practical component: simple mind-body illusions that instructors may use to demonstrate contrary epistemologies to students. Combining these short philosophical and neuroscience arguments thereby acts as a pedagogical tool to open new conceptual spaces within which learning may occur.

摘要

在本科低年级的神经科学和心理学课程中,一个基本的讨论话题是笛卡尔的“激进”或“身心”二元论。根据笛卡尔的观点,我们的思维心智,即“能思之物”(res cogitans),与作为物质实体的身体,即“广延之物”(res extensa)是分开的。由于从身体向心智传递感觉刺激是动物也具备的一种物理能力,所以这种传递可能会出现混淆、误导或不确定的情况(例如,身体感官会让人觉得冰和水是不同的物质)。因此,真正的确定性源自心智内部及其怀疑物理刺激的能力。由于这种具有怀疑能力的心智是一种与身体刺激不同的思维之物,所以通过作为“我思故我在”的怀疑心智,或者说通过其思考时对自身的确定性,就能获得真理和确定性:这就是笛卡尔著名的格言“我思,故我在”。然而,在西方哲学的上一个世纪,随着神经系统研究以及神经科学的最新进展,探索学生对笛卡尔身心二元论的认识论及其影响的潜在途径已经有所扩展。本文进一步探讨这种扩展,强调教师可以用来增强心理学专业学生对笛卡尔二元论认识论理解的教学实践和工具,以便更批判性地思考其隐含假设及其对学习的影响。本文通过两种方式来实现这一目的:第一,为教师提供一种与二元论思维不同的哲学视角:一种与二元论认识论所假定的二元对立相反的身心整体论。第二,用一个实践部分来补充这一哲学论证:教师可以用来向学生展示相反认识论的简单身心错觉。将这些简短的哲学和神经科学论证结合起来,从而作为一种教学工具,开辟出可能发生学习的新的概念空间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验