• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
DSM-IV schizotypal personality disorder: a taxometric analysis among individuals with and without substance use disorders in the general population.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的分裂型人格障碍:普通人群中患有和未患有物质使用障碍个体的分类分析
Ment Health Subst Use. 2014;7(4):446-460. doi: 10.1080/17523281.2014.946076.
2
DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder: evidence for taxonic structures among individuals with and without substance use disorders in the general population.DSM-IV 反社会人格障碍和品行障碍:在一般人群中有无物质使用障碍个体的分类结构证据。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 May;75(3):496-509. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.496.
3
Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV schizotypal personality disorder: results from the wave 2 national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版分裂型人格障碍的患病率、相关因素、残疾情况及共病情况:酒精及相关疾病全国流行病学第二次调查结果
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(2):53-67. doi: 10.4088/pcc.08m00679.
4
Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research.人格与精神病理学中的类别与维度:分类测量研究的定量综述。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):903-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001966. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Comparison of self-report and clinician-rated schizotypal traits in schizotypal personality disorder and community controls.在精神分裂型人格障碍患者和社区对照者中,自我报告和临床医生评定的精神分裂型特质的比较。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jul;209:263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.050. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Moderately Eccentric: Evidence for Dimensionality in the Latent Structure of Schizotypal Personality Features.中度异常:精神分裂型人格特征潜在结构的维度证据。
J Pers Disord. 2022 Aug;36(4):489-502. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.4.489.
7
Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of cluster-C, paranoid, and borderline personality disorders.轴 II 障碍聚类-C、偏执型和边缘型人格障碍的维度结构的分类测量学证据。
J Pers Disord. 2009 Dec;23(6):606-28. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.6.606.
8
Using the comparison curve fix index (CCFI) in taxometric analyses: Averaging curves, standard errors, and CCFI profiles.使用分类曲线拟合指标(CCFI)进行分类分析:平均曲线、标准误差和 CCFI 分布。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jun;30(6):744-754. doi: 10.1037/pas0000522. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Schizotypal Personality Disorder: Detecting Individuals at Risk.分裂型人格障碍的计算机自适应测试:检测高危个体。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 25;11:574760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574760. eCollection 2020.
10
Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead.分裂型人格特质的维度性与类别性:一些新数据及面临的挑战
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S465-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu221.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Bootstrap to Taxometric Analysis: Generating Empirical Sampling Distributions to Help Interpret Results.应用自举法于税式分析:生成经验抽样分布以帮助解释结果。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):349-86. doi: 10.1080/00273170701360795.
2
Does a latent class underlie schizotypal personality disorder? Implications for schizophrenia.是否存在潜在的精神分裂型人格障碍类别?对精神分裂症的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 May;122(2):475-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032713.
3
Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years.5 年内临床医生诊断、自我报告和结构化访谈诊断人格障碍的会聚和增量预测效度。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):650-659. doi: 10.1037/a0032813. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Annual research review: categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders--implications of recent empirical study.年度研究综述:儿童和青少年精神障碍分类和概念化中的类别与维度——近期实证研究的启示。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):469-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02511.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
5
Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research.人格与精神病理学中的类别与维度:分类测量研究的定量综述。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):903-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001966. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.使用一致性检验比较类别潜变量模型和维度潜变量模型的相对拟合度。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018259.
7
Categories and Dimensions Advancing Psychological Science Through the Study of Latent Structure.通过潜在结构研究推进心理科学的类别与维度
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun 28;17(3):203-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00575.x.
8
A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for assessment and treatment.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑症和情绪障碍共同特征的维度分类系统提案:对评估和治疗的启示
Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):256-71. doi: 10.1037/a0016608.
9
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
10
Associations between past alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine use and current schizotypy among first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia and non-psychiatric controls.精神分裂症患者一级亲属及非精神科对照人群中既往酒精、大麻和可卡因使用与当前分裂型人格特质之间的关联。
Psychiatr Q. 2009 Sep;80(3):143-54. doi: 10.1007/s11126-009-9102-x. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的分裂型人格障碍:普通人群中患有和未患有物质使用障碍个体的分类分析

DSM-IV schizotypal personality disorder: a taxometric analysis among individuals with and without substance use disorders in the general population.

作者信息

Kerridge Bradley T, Saha Tulshi D, Hasin Deborah S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168 Street, New York, NY, 10032.

Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, Intramural Division of Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5636 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland, 20852.

出版信息

Ment Health Subst Use. 2014;7(4):446-460. doi: 10.1080/17523281.2014.946076.

DOI:10.1080/17523281.2014.946076
PMID:26322122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4549000/
Abstract

This study examined the underlying structure of DSM-IV schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) among individuals with and without a substance use disorder. Using a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults, taxometric analyses were conducted on SPD in the total sample and among individuals with and without a substance use disorder. The structure of SPD in the total sample and among individuals without substance use disorders was dimensional (comparison curve fit indices (CCFI): 0.440, 0.365) whereas a taxonic structure was demonstrated among individuals with a substance use disorder (CCFI: 0.679). Taxonicity underlying schizotypy and SPD in prior taxometric research may have been the result of sampling high risk subsamples of the population. Taxometric research on SPD and other personality psychopathology among high risk subgroups of the population can help elucidate the complex etiology of SPD and the role played by comorbid substance use disorders in the expressivity of these disorders.

摘要

本研究调查了患有和未患有物质使用障碍的个体中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)精神分裂样人格障碍(SPD)的潜在结构。利用美国成年人的全国代表性样本,对总样本以及患有和未患有物质使用障碍的个体进行了关于SPD的分类分析。总样本以及未患有物质使用障碍的个体中SPD的结构呈维度性(比较曲线拟合指数(CCFI):0.440,0.365),而在患有物质使用障碍的个体中呈现出类属结构(CCFI:0.679)。先前分类分析研究中精神分裂症样症状和SPD的类属性可能是对该人群高风险子样本进行抽样的结果。对该人群高风险亚组中的SPD和其他人格精神病理学进行分类分析研究,有助于阐明SPD的复杂病因以及共病物质使用障碍在这些障碍表现中的作用。