• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分裂型人格特质的维度性与类别性:一些新数据及面临的挑战

Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead.

作者信息

Everett Kirsty V, Linscott Richard J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Porirua CMHT, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand;

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S465-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu221.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbu221
PMID:25810059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4373639/
Abstract

Heterogeneity in the expression of schizotypy may arise from underlying dimensional processes or a taxonic population structure. In a 2-phase study, we tested the taxonicity of self-reported schizotypy within a general psychiatric sample (n = 109) and examined taxon validity by testing its association with clinical schizotaxia in follow-up subsamples. Taxometric analyses indicated a taxonic structure (schizotypy prevalence = 38.8%) provided the best description of the underlying population distribution. After a year, schizotypal (n = 14) and nonschizotypal (n = 14) subsamples returned for diagnosis of clinical schizotaxia by assessment of executive functioning, attention, memory, and negative symptoms. Seven patients met diagnostic criteria, all members of the schizotypy class. Schizotypy was associated with impaired attention and memory, more negative symptoms, poorer global functioning, and more extensive psychiatric histories. We reconcile inconsistencies in the literature by discussing threats to the validity of this and similar research on Meehl's taxonomic model of schizotypy, including conceptual limitations of the lexical hypothesis and conventions of factor analysis. Scrutiny of Meehl's model should involve disambiguation and better measurement of the schizotaxia-schizotypy phenotype.

摘要

精神分裂症型人格特质表达的异质性可能源于潜在的维度过程或分类群体结构。在一项两阶段研究中,我们在一个普通精神科样本(n = 109)中测试了自我报告的精神分裂症型人格特质的分类性,并通过在后续子样本中测试其与临床精神分裂症相关症状的关联来检验分类单元的有效性。分类测量分析表明,一种分类结构(精神分裂症型人格特质患病率 = 38.8%)能最好地描述潜在的总体分布。一年后,精神分裂症型人格特质组(n = 14)和非精神分裂症型人格特质组(n = 14)的子样本返回,通过评估执行功能、注意力、记忆力和阴性症状来诊断临床精神分裂症相关症状。7名患者符合诊断标准,均为精神分裂症型人格特质组的成员。精神分裂症型人格特质与注意力和记忆力受损、更多的阴性症状、更差的整体功能以及更广泛的精神病史有关。我们通过讨论对该研究以及关于精神分裂症型人格特质的Meehl分类模型的类似研究有效性的威胁,来调和文献中的不一致之处,包括词汇假设的概念局限性和因子分析的惯例。对Meehl模型的审查应涉及消除歧义以及对精神分裂症相关症状 - 精神分裂症型人格特质表型进行更好的测量。

相似文献

1
Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead.分裂型人格特质的维度性与类别性:一些新数据及面临的挑战
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S465-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu221.
2
The latent structure and coincidence of hypohedonia and schizotypy and their validity as indices of psychometric risk for schizophrenia.快感缺乏与精神分裂症型人格特质的潜在结构、重合性及其作为精神分裂症心理测量风险指标的效度
J Pers Disord. 2007 Jun;21(3):225-42. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.3.225.
3
The Latent Taxonicity of Schizotypy in Biological Siblings of Probands With Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者生物同胞的精神分裂特质的潜在分类学。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):922-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx143.
4
The taxonicity of schizotypy: does the same taxonic class structure emerge from analyses of different attributes of schizotypy and from fundamentally different statistical methods?分裂型特质的分类学特性:不同的分裂型特质分析属性和从根本上不同的统计方法得出的分类结构是否相同?
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
The taxonicity of schizotypy: a replication.分裂型特质的分类性:一项重复研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Feb;104(1):26-31. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.1.26.
6
Confirming the latent structure and base rate of schizotypy: a taxometric analysis.验证分裂型人格特质的潜在结构和基础比率:一项类属分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Aug;101(3):567-71. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.567.
7
"Schizotaxia": clinical implications and new directions for research.“精神分裂症前驱期症状”:临床意义与研究新方向
Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(1):1-18. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006849.
8
Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study.精神分裂症相关症状的同步验证:一项初步研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep 15;50(6):434-40. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01116-7.
9
The silent side of the spectrum: schizotypy and the schizotaxic self.光谱的静默面:类精神分裂型人格特质与分裂型自我。
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37(5):1017-26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq008. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
10
Testing the Validity of Taxonic Schizotypy Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Variables.使用遗传和环境风险变量检验分类学上的分裂型人格特质的有效性。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):633-643. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw108.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.分裂型人格特质评估:针对临床与人格模型的系统综述
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2022 Jan-Jun;15(1):84-97. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5292.
2
The effect of schizotypy on spatial learning in an environment with a distinctive shape.精神分裂型人格特质对在具有独特形状环境中的空间学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:929653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929653. eCollection 2022.
3
Cortical and subcortical neuroanatomical signatures of schizotypy in 3004 individuals assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study.在一项全球性的 ENIGMA 研究中,对 3004 个人进行评估,发现了精神分裂症倾向的皮质和皮质下神经解剖学特征。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;27(2):1167-1176. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01359-9. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
The Network Structure of Schizotypal Personality Traits.精神分裂型人格特质的网络结构。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 15;44(suppl_2):S468-S479. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby044.
5
Clustering of Schizotypal Features in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients.精神分裂症患者未受影响的一级亲属中精神分裂症特征的聚类。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 15;44(suppl_2):S536-S546. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby035.
6
Perspectives on Machine Learning for Classification of Schizotypy Using fMRI Data.基于 fMRI 数据的精神分裂症倾向分类的机器学习方法研究进展。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 15;44(suppl_2):S480-S490. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby026.
7
The Latent Taxonicity of Schizotypy in Biological Siblings of Probands With Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者生物同胞的精神分裂特质的潜在分类学。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):922-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx143.
8
Testing the Validity of Taxonic Schizotypy Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Variables.使用遗传和环境风险变量检验分类学上的分裂型人格特质的有效性。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):633-643. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw108.
9
Schizotypal personality questionnaire--brief revised (updated): An update of norms, factor structure, and item content in a large non-clinical young adult sample.分裂型人格问卷——简短修订版(更新版):大型非临床青年成人样本中常模、因素结构及项目内容的更新
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.053. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Integration and development in schizotypy research: an introduction to the special supplement.分裂型人格障碍研究的整合与发展:专题增刊引言
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S363-5. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv003.

本文引用的文献

1
Approach, avoidance, and their conflict: the problem of anchoring.趋近、回避及其冲突:锚定问题。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jul 3;8:124. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00124. eCollection 2014.
2
Development of liability syndromes for schizophrenia: where did they come from and where are they going?精神分裂症责任综合征的发展:它们从何而来,又将去向何方?
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013 Oct;162B(7):687-97. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32185.
3
Classification and psychopathology research.分类与精神病理学研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):894-901. doi: 10.1037/a0033096.
4
The taxonicity of schizotypy: does the same taxonic class structure emerge from analyses of different attributes of schizotypy and from fundamentally different statistical methods?分裂型特质的分类学特性:不同的分裂型特质分析属性和从根本上不同的统计方法得出的分类结构是否相同?
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.为何项目与包裹之争并非不可调和。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):285-300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Does a latent class underlie schizotypal personality disorder? Implications for schizophrenia.是否存在潜在的精神分裂型人格障碍类别?对精神分裂症的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 May;122(2):475-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032713.
7
Latent structure of psychotic experiences in the general population.一般人群中精神病性体验的潜在结构。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Jan;125(1):54-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01800.x. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
8
Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research.人格与精神病理学中的类别与维度:分类测量研究的定量综述。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):903-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001966. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
9
Psychometric properties of two measures for the assessment of Schizotypy in adolescents.青少年精神分裂症倾向评估的两种测量方法的心理测量学特性。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Sep 30;179(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.02.012. Epub 2010 May 18.
10
Systematic reviews of categorical versus continuum models in psychosis: evidence for discontinuous subpopulations underlying a psychometric continuum. Implications for DSM-V, DSM-VI, and DSM-VII.精神病学中类别模型与连续体模型的系统评价:精神测量连续体下存在不连续亚群的证据。对 DSM-V、DSM-VI 和 DSM-VII 的启示。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:391-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153506.