Aichelburg Maximilian C, Weseslindtner Lukas, Mandorfer Mattias, Strassl Robert, Rieger Armin, Reiberger Thomas, Puchhammer-Stöckl Elisabeth, Grabmeier-Pfistershammer Katharina
Department of Dermatology, Division of Immunology, Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DIAID), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0137096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137096. eCollection 2015.
Among HIV-1-infected individuals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease occur in the setting of advanced immunosuppression. The value of a standardized assessment of CMV-specific T-cell mediated immunity by the CMV QuantiFERON assay (CMV-QFT) has not yet been thoroughly investigated in HIV-1-infected subjects.
Prospective, longitudinal study in 153 HIV-1-infected subjects with a CD4+ T cell count < 350/μL who simultaneously underwent CMV-QFT, CMV serology testing and CMV-DNA quantification. Factors associated with CMV-QFT were evaluated. Clinical screening for CMV manifestations was then performed every 3 months.
Among the 141 CMV IgG-seropositive individuals the CMV-QFT assay yielded reactive results in 84% (118/141), negative results in 15% (21/141) and indeterminate (negative mitogen IFN-gamma response) results in 1% (2/141) of subjects. The mean actual CD4+ T cell count was significantly higher in CMV-QFT reactive subjects, when compared to CMV-QFT non-reactive individuals (183 ± 102 vs. 126 ± 104 cells/μL, P = 0.015). A significantly lower proportion of CMV-QFT reactive vs. non-reactive patients displayed CMV DNAemia > 100 copies/mL (23% (27/118) vs. 48% (11/23), P = 0.02). Furthermore, a statistically significant inverse association between mitogen IFN-gamma response and CMV-DNAemia > 1000 copies/mL was observed (P < 0.001). During the observational period, 5 CMV end-organ manifestations were observed. In three of the CMV cases the CMV-QFT yielded indeterminate results.
While CMV-QFT reactivity indicates CMV-specific immunity, indeterminate results due to negative mitogen IFN-gamma response might reflect HIV-1-induced immunodeficiency. Thus, dependency upon CD4+ T cell count should be considered when interpreting CMV-QFT results.
在人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染个体中,巨细胞病毒(CMV)再激活及疾病发生于严重免疫抑制的情况下。CMV定量干扰素检测法(CMV-QFT)对CMV特异性T细胞介导免疫进行标准化评估的价值,在HIV-1感染受试者中尚未得到充分研究。
对153例CD4+T细胞计数<350/μL的HIV-1感染受试者进行前瞻性纵向研究,这些受试者同时接受CMV-QFT、CMV血清学检测和CMV-DNA定量检测。评估与CMV-QFT相关的因素。然后每3个月对CMV表现进行临床筛查。
在141例CMV IgG血清学阳性个体中,CMV-QFT检测结果为阳性的占84%(118/141),阴性的占15%(21/141),不确定(有丝分裂原干扰素-γ反应阴性)结果的占1%(2/141)。与CMV-QFT无反应个体相比,CMV-QFT有反应受试者的实际CD4+T细胞平均计数显著更高(183±102对126±104个细胞/μL,P=0.015)。CMV-QFT有反应患者中CMV DNA血症>100拷贝/mL的比例显著低于无反应患者(23%(27/118)对48%(11/23),P=0.02)。此外,观察到有丝分裂原干扰素-γ反应与CMV-DNA血症>1000拷贝/mL之间存在统计学显著的负相关(P<0.001)。在观察期内,观察到5例CMV终末器官表现。在3例CMV病例中,CMV-QFT检测结果不确定。
虽然CMV-QFT反应性表明CMV特异性免疫,但有丝分裂原干扰素-γ反应阴性导致的不确定结果可能反映了HIV-1诱导的免疫缺陷。因此,在解释CMV-QFT结果时应考虑对CD4+T细胞计数的依赖性。