Sandica Eugen, Boethig Dietmar, Blanz Ute, Goerg Rainer, Haas Nikolaus Andreas, Laser Kai Thorsten, Kececioglu Deniz, Bertram Harald, Sarikouch Samir, Westhoff-Bleck Mechthild, Beerbaum Philipp, Horke Alexander
Clinic of Surgery for Congenital Heart Defects, Center for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Center North-Rhine Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Clinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;64(1):25-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554962. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
Various diseases and diversity in implantation ages, together with evolving diagnostic and therapeutic options, hinder comparative evaluations of long-term outcomes for valved conduits used for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). We combined two common evaluation methods to optimally use information obtained by pooling the raw data from two high volume centers, each with very regular follow-up procedures, with the aim of analyzing durability differences between conventional homografts and bovine jugular veins.
In the period 1985 to 2012, a total of 444 bovine jugular veins and 267 homografts were implanted, and 6,738 postoperative examinations took place. Evaluations included age-stratified Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox regression models, and time status graphs, the third showing age-group stratified, time-related frequencies of intact, insufficient, stenotic, both insufficient and stenotic, and postinterventional conduits below the freedom from explantation curve. They take into account interventions, explantations, and the nonterminal character of echocardiographic findings.
The durability of intact bovine jugular veins in children and young adults is not inferior to that of homografts. Averaged over the first 12 years after implantation, the age groups < 25 years in fact showed advantages for bovine jugular vein recipients. The average fraction of patients younger than 25 years whose conduits were not explanted, postinterventional, stenotic, insufficient, or stenotic and insufficient was at least 10% higher in recipients of bovine jugular veins than in homograft recipients.
According to the time status graphs, the use of bovine jugular veins for RVOT in patients younger than 25 years appears to lead to superior results when compared with cryopreserved homografts.
各种疾病、植入年龄的差异以及不断发展的诊断和治疗选择,阻碍了对用于右心室流出道(RVOT)重建的带瓣管道长期结果的比较评估。我们结合了两种常用的评估方法,以最佳利用从两个大容量中心汇集的原始数据所获得的信息,这两个中心都有非常规范的随访程序,目的是分析传统同种异体移植物和牛颈静脉之间的耐久性差异。
在1985年至2012年期间,共植入了444条牛颈静脉和267条同种异体移植物,并进行了6738次术后检查。评估包括年龄分层的Kaplan-Meier分析、Cox回归模型和时间状态图,第三种方法显示了年龄组分层、与时间相关的完整、功能不全、狭窄、功能不全和狭窄以及介入后管道低于免于植入曲线的频率。它们考虑了干预、植入以及超声心动图结果的非终末期特征。
儿童和年轻人中完整牛颈静脉的耐久性不低于同种异体移植物。在植入后的前12年平均来看,年龄小于25岁的年龄组实际上显示出牛颈静脉接受者的优势。年龄小于25岁且其管道未被植入、介入后、狭窄、功能不全或狭窄且功能不全的患者的平均比例,牛颈静脉接受者比同种异体移植物接受者至少高10%。
根据时间状态图,与冷冻保存的同种异体移植物相比,在25岁以下患者中使用牛颈静脉进行RVOT重建似乎能带来更好的结果。