• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)计算机算法的开发与验证

Development and validation of a computerized algorithm for International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI).

作者信息

Walden K, Bélanger L M, Biering-Sørensen F, Burns S P, Echeverria E, Kirshblum S, Marino R J, Noonan V K, Park S E, Reeves R K, Waring W, Dvorak M F

机构信息

Rick Hansen Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Vancouver Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2016 Mar;54(3):197-203. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.137. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1038/sc.2015.137
PMID:26323348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5399136/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Validation study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development and validation of a computerized application of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (ISNCSCI).

SETTING

Data from acute and rehabilitation care.

METHODS

The Rick Hansen Institute-ISNCSCI Algorithm (RHI-ISNCSCI Algorithm) was developed based on the 2011 version of the ISNCSCI and the 2013 version of the worksheet. International experts developed the design and logic with a focus on usability and features to standardize the correct classification of challenging cases. A five-phased process was used to develop and validate the algorithm. Discrepancies between the clinician-derived and algorithm-calculated results were reconciled.

RESULTS

Phase one of the validation used 48 cases to develop the logic. Phase three used these and 15 additional cases for further logic development to classify cases with 'Not testable' values. For logic testing in phases two and four, 351 and 1998 cases from the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR), respectively, were used. Of 23 and 286 discrepant cases identified in phases two and four, 2 and 6 cases resulted in changes to the algorithm. Cross-validation of the algorithm in phase five using 108 new RHSCIR cases did not identify the need for any further changes, as all discrepancies were due to clinician errors. The web-based application and the algorithm code are freely available at www.isncscialgorithm.com.

CONCLUSION

The RHI-ISNCSCI Algorithm provides a standardized method to accurately derive the level and severity of SCI from the raw data of the ISNCSCI examination. The web interface assists in maximizing usability while minimizing the impact of human error in classifying SCI.

SPONSORSHIP

This study is sponsored by the Rick Hansen Institute and supported by funding from Health Canada and Western Economic Diversification Canada.

摘要

研究设计

验证性研究。

目的

描述脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)计算机应用程序的开发与验证。

背景

急性和康复护理数据。

方法

基于2011版ISNCSCI和2013版工作表开发了里克·汉森研究所 - ISNCSCI算法(RHI - ISNCSCI算法)。国际专家制定了设计和逻辑,重点关注可用性和功能,以规范对具有挑战性病例的正确分类。采用五阶段流程来开发和验证该算法。对临床医生得出的结果与算法计算结果之间的差异进行了核对。

结果

验证的第一阶段使用48个病例来开发逻辑。第三阶段使用这些病例以及另外15个病例进行进一步的逻辑开发,以对具有“不可测试”值的病例进行分类。在第二和第四阶段进行逻辑测试时,分别使用了来自里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处(RHSCIR)的351个和并1998个病例。在第二和第四阶段识别出的23个和286个差异病例中,有2个和6个病例导致了算法的更改。在第五阶段使用108个新的RHSCIR病例对该算法进行交叉验证时,未发现需要进一步更改的情况,因为所有差异均是由于临床医生的错误所致。基于网络的应用程序和算法代码可在www.isncscialgorithm.com上免费获取。

结论

RHI - ISNCSCI算法提供了一种标准化方法,可从ISNCSCI检查的原始数据中准确得出脊髓损伤的水平和严重程度。网络界面有助于最大限度地提高可用性,同时在脊髓损伤分类中最小化人为错误的影响。

资助

本研究由里克·汉森研究所赞助,并得到加拿大卫生部和加拿大西部经济多样化部的资金支持。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a computerized algorithm for International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI).脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)计算机算法的开发与验证
Spinal Cord. 2016 Mar;54(3):197-203. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.137. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.在脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准方面实现评估者的准确性。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):994-1001. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.67. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: a prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry.一种用于预测脊髓损伤后独立行走能力的简化临床预测规则:一项来自加拿大多中心脊髓损伤登记处的前瞻性研究。
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1383-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:修订工作表(02/13 修订版)对分类性能的影响
J Spinal Cord Med. 2016 Sep;39(5):504-12. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1180831. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
5
Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review.计算机国际标准神经学分类脊髓损伤(ISNCSCI)算法:综述。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Feb;61(2):125-132. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00854-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
6
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: factors influencing the frequency, completion and accuracy of documentation of neurology for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:影响创伤性脊髓损伤患者神经学记录频率、完整性及准确性的因素
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Dec;29(8):1639-1648. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02502-7. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: classification skills of clinicians versus computational algorithms.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:临床医生的分类技能与计算算法对比
Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):324-31. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.221. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Classification Accuracy and Challenges.国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准:准确性和挑战。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2023 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.46292/sci22-00036. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
9
Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry.开发和评估里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处的社区随访问卷。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1753-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
10
Computer implementation of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury for consistent and efficient derivation of its subscores including handling of data from not testable segments.计算机实现国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准,以便一致、高效地推导其亚评分,包括处理无法测试节段的数据。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Feb 10;29(3):453-61. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2085. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pattern of neurological recovery in persons with an acute cervical spinal cord injury over the first 14 days post injury.急性颈脊髓损伤患者伤后14天内的神经恢复模式。
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1278826. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1278826. eCollection 2023.
2
Enabling knowledge translation: implementation of a web-based tool for independent walking prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury.促进知识转化:实施一种用于创伤性脊髓损伤后独立行走预测的基于网络的工具。
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1219307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219307. eCollection 2023.
3
The gray matter atrophy and related network changes occur in the higher cognitive region rather than the primary sensorimotor cortex after spinal cord injury.

本文引用的文献

1
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: classification skills of clinicians versus computational algorithms.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:临床医生的分类技能与计算算法对比
Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):324-31. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.221. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
2
Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial.基于活动的疗法对慢性脊髓损伤患者步行功能恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验的结果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2239-46.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.400. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Updates for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.
脊髓损伤后,灰质萎缩和相关的网络变化发生在高级认知区域,而不是初级感觉运动皮层。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 9;11:e16172. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16172. eCollection 2023.
4
Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review.计算机国际标准神经学分类脊髓损伤(ISNCSCI)算法:综述。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Feb;61(2):125-132. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00854-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
Validity and responsiveness of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for sub-acute traumatic spinal cord injury.亚急性创伤性脊髓损伤站立与行走评估工具的效度和反应性
Spinal Cord. 2022 Dec;60(12):1108-1114. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00830-w. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Neglected floating cervical spine fracture with myelopathy and Anderson lesion of D2 D3: report of an unusual case.被忽视的颈椎浮起骨折伴脊髓病和 D2-D3 的安德森损伤:一例不寻常病例报告。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Feb 10;8(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00487-w.
7
Transforming SCI rehabilitation care through innovation.通过创新变革脊髓损伤康复护理。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(sup1):S5-S16. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1965449.
8
Implementation of multilingual support of the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) ISNCSCI calculator.实施欧洲脊髓损伤多中心研究(EMSCI)ISNCSCI 计算器的多语言支持。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jan;60(1):37-44. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00672-y. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
9
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:2019年修订版》
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):1-22. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-1.
10
A taxonomy for consistent handling of conditions not related to the spinal cord injury (SCI) in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI).用于国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(ISNCSCI)中一致处理与脊髓损伤(SCI)无关的情况的分类法。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jan;60(1):18-29. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00646-0. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
《脊髓损伤神经分类国际标准》的更新内容。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 Aug;25(3):505-17, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.04.001.
4
Functional electrical stimulation as a component of activity-based restorative therapy may preserve function in persons with multiple sclerosis.功能性电刺激作为基于活动的恢复性治疗的一个组成部分,可能会保留多发性硬化症患者的功能。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Jan;38(1):68-75. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000238. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
5
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: cases with classification challenges.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:存在分类挑战的病例
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Mar;37(2):120-7. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000196.
6
Relationship between neurological injury and patterns of upright mobility in children with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤儿童的神经损伤与直立移动模式之间的关系。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013 Winter;19(1):31-41. doi: 10.1310/sci1901-31.
7
Distribution-based estimates of clinically significant changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor and sensory scores.基于分布的国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准运动和感觉评分临床显著变化的估计。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Jun;49(3):373-84. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Light touch and pin prick disparity in the International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI).国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(ISNCSCI)中的轻触与刺痛差异。
Spinal Cord. 2013 May;51(5):375-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.175. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Effect of formal training in scaling, scoring and classification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤国际神经分类标准的刮除、评分和分类正式培训的效果。
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):282-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.149. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后的临床诊断与预后
Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47-62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.