Biscaglia Simone, Campo Gianluca, Tebaldi Matteo, Tumscitz Carlo, Pavasini Rita, Fileti Luca, Secco Gioel G, Di Mario Carlo, Ferrari Roberto
Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Via Aldo Moro 8, Cona, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
LTTA Centre, Ferrara, Italy.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;32(2):211-223. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0756-1. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
To assess if enhanced stent visualization (ESV)-guided implantation of overlapping bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is superior to angiography alone-guided implantation in the reduction of overlap length. WOLFIE is a two-centre prospective open study enrolling 30 patients treated with implantation of at least two overlapping BVS. In the first centre (London), BVS implantation was guided by conventional angiography, while in the second centre (Ferrara), an ESV system was systematically employed. The primary endpoint of the study was overlap length. Secondary endpoints were: stacked struts number, area, thickness, and amount of clusters. In the ESV-guided group, overlap length was significantly lower compared to angiography-guided group [0.9 (0.6-1.8) vs. 2.2 (1.3-3.2) mm, p = 0.02]. Similarly, all secondary endpoints were significantly reduced. ESV-guided implantation of overlapping BVS is safe and effective in minimizing both overlap length and number of stacked struts.
评估增强型支架可视化(ESV)引导下重叠生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)植入术在减少重叠长度方面是否优于单纯血管造影引导下的植入术。WOLFIE是一项两中心前瞻性开放研究,纳入30例接受至少两个重叠BVS植入治疗的患者。在第一个中心(伦敦),BVS植入由传统血管造影引导,而在第二个中心(费拉拉),系统地使用了ESV系统。该研究的主要终点是重叠长度。次要终点包括:堆叠支柱数量、面积、厚度和簇的数量。在ESV引导组中,与血管造影引导组相比,重叠长度显著更低[0.9(0.6 - 1.8)对2.2(1.3 - 3.2)mm,p = 0.02]。同样,所有次要终点均显著降低。ESV引导下重叠BVS植入术在最小化重叠长度和堆叠支柱数量方面是安全有效的。