Frech Adrianne, Lynch Jamie L, Barr Peter
Department of Sociology, The University of Akron, 247 Olin Hall, Akron, OH, 44325-1905, USA.
Department of Sociology, St. Norbert College, 454 Boyle Hall, 100 Grant Street, De Pere, WI, 54115, USA.
J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;39(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9673-y. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
We use the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health to examine union and parenthood differences across same and opposite-sex couples in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and abdominal adiposity (waist circumference) among partnered (dating, cohabiting, married) young adults ages 25-33. Relative to women dating men, women cohabiting with women reported lower DBP and were less likely to have high CRP. Mothers reported lower SBP and DBP than non-mothers, but were more likely to have high waist circumference if they lived with a biological or step-child. Among men, nonresidential fathers reported higher DBP than nonfathers, and married men were more likely to have high waist circumference than men dating an opposite-sex partner. Same-sex cohabitation was neither a risk factor nor a health resource for men. Although the sample sizes for same-sex couples are quite small compared with those for opposite-sex couples, this study provides initial insight that occupying a sexual minority status while partnered is associated with some health benefits and few or no health risks relative to those who are dating an opposite sex partner.
我们利用青少年到成人健康的全国纵向调查,来研究年龄在25至33岁之间的恋爱(约会、同居、已婚)青年异性恋和同性恋伴侣在收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)、C反应蛋白(CRP)以及腹部肥胖(腰围)方面的差异。与和男性约会的女性相比,与女性同居的女性舒张压较低,且患高CRP的可能性较小。母亲的收缩压和舒张压低于非母亲,但如果她们与亲生孩子或继子女生活在一起,腰围较高的可能性更大。在男性中,非居住型父亲的舒张压高于非父亲,已婚男性的腰围高于与异性伴侣约会的男性。同性同居对男性既不是风险因素也不是健康资源。尽管与异性恋伴侣相比,同性恋伴侣的样本量相当小,但这项研究提供了初步的见解,即恋爱时处于性少数群体状态与一些健康益处相关,相对于与异性约会的人而言,健康风险很少或没有。