Suppr超能文献

真核生物在先:怎么会这样呢?

Eukaryotes first: how could that be?

作者信息

Mariscal Carlos, Doolittle W Ford

机构信息

Departments of Philosophy, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2.

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 26;370(1678):20140322. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0322.

Abstract

In the half century since the formulation of the prokaryote : eukaryote dichotomy, many authors have proposed that the former evolved from something resembling the latter, in defiance of common (and possibly common sense) views. In such 'eukaryotes first' (EF) scenarios, the last universal common ancestor is imagined to have possessed significantly many of the complex characteristics of contemporary eukaryotes, as relics of an earlier 'progenotic' period or RNA world. Bacteria and Archaea thus must have lost these complex features secondarily, through 'streamlining'. If the canonical three-domain tree in which Archaea and Eukarya are sisters is accepted, EF entails that Bacteria and Archaea are convergently prokaryotic. We ask what this means and how it might be tested.

摘要

自提出原核生物与真核生物二分法以来的半个世纪里,许多作者不顾普遍(甚至可能是常识性)观点,提出前者是从类似后者的某种东西进化而来的。在这种“真核生物先出现”(EF)的设想中,最后的共同祖先被认为拥有当代真核生物的许多复杂特征,这些特征是早期“原生生物”时期或RNA世界的遗留物。因此,细菌和古菌必然是通过“简化”而次生地失去了这些复杂特征。如果接受古菌和真核生物是姐妹关系的标准三域树,那么EF意味着细菌和古菌是趋同的原核生物。我们探讨这意味着什么以及如何进行检验。

相似文献

1
Eukaryotes first: how could that be?真核生物在先:怎么会这样呢?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 26;370(1678):20140322. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0322.
4
The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes.真核生物起源模型的可证伪性。
Curr Genet. 2011 Dec;57(6):367-90. doi: 10.1007/s00294-011-0357-z. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
10
Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition.古生菌与原核生物向真核生物的转变
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Dec;61(4):456-502. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.4.456-502.1997.

引用本文的文献

2
The elements of life: A biocentric tour of the periodic table.生命的元素:元素周期表的生物中心之旅。
Adv Microb Physiol. 2023;82:1-127. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2022.11.001. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
The Evolution of the Hallmarks of Aging.衰老特征的演变
Front Genet. 2021 Aug 26;12:693071. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.693071. eCollection 2021.
4
The essence of life revisited: how theories can shed light on it.生命本质再探:理论如何为之增光添彩。
Theory Biosci. 2022 Jun;141(2):105-123. doi: 10.1007/s12064-021-00342-w. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.关于真核生物起源的观念转变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 26;370(1678):20140318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0318.

本文引用的文献

1
The two-domain tree of life is linked to a new root for the Archaea.生命的两域树与古菌的一个新根相连。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 26;112(21):6670-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420858112. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Eukaryogenesis, how special really?真核生物的起源,究竟有多特别?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10278-85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421376112. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Dramatically reduced spliceosome in Cyanidioschyzon merolae.梅氏嗜热蓝藻中剪接体显著减少。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):E1191-200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416879112. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
5
The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes.真核生物和原核生物的相对年代。
J Mol Evol. 2014 Dec;79(5-6):228-39. doi: 10.1007/s00239-014-9643-y. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Origin of spliceosomal introns and alternative splicing.剪接体内含子和可变剪接的起源。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Jun 2;6(6):a016071. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016071.
7
The trouble with (group II) introns.(II 类)内含子的问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 6;111(18):6536-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405174111. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology.精简理论对微生物生态学的影响。
ISME J. 2014 Aug;8(8):1553-65. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.60. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验