• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在印度和南非开展的临床试验及后续药品批准情况的批判性评估。

A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa.

作者信息

Limaye Dnyanesh, Langer Janka Marisa, Rühling Tjorben, Fortwengel Gerhard

机构信息

Faculty III, Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 31;5(8):e007304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007304.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007304
PMID:26324720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4554898/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relation between the number of clinical trials conducted and respective new drug approvals in India and South Africa.

DESIGN

Construction and analysis of a comprehensive database of completed randomised controlled clinical trials based on clinicaltrials.gov from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2010 and drug approval data from 2006 until 2013 for India and South Africa.

SETTING

USA, the EU, India and South Africa.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of completed randomised clinical trials for an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) leading to new drug approval in India and South Africa.

RESULTS

A total of 622 eligible randomised controlled trials were identified as per search criteria for India and South Africa. Clustering them for the same sponsor and the same Investigational New Drug (IND) resulted in 453 eligible trials, that is, 224 for India and 229 for South Africa. The distribution of the market application approvals between the EU/USA as well as India and South Africa revealed that out of clinical trials with the participation of test centres in India and/or South Africa, 39.6% (India) clinical trials and 60.1% (South Africa) clinical trials led to market authorisation in the EU/USA without a New Drug Application (NDA) approval in India or South Africa.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in clinical trial activities, there is a clear gap between the number of trials conducted and market availability of these new drugs in India and South Africa. Drug regulatory authorities, investigators, institutional review boards and patient groups should direct their efforts to ensuring availability of new drugs in the market that have been tested and researched on their population.

摘要

目的

评估在印度和南非开展的临床试验数量与相应新药获批情况之间的关系。

设计

基于clinicaltrials.gov构建并分析一个关于2005年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间完成的随机对照临床试验的综合数据库,以及印度和南非2006年至2013年的药物获批数据。

地点

美国、欧盟、印度和南非。

主要观察指标

在印度和南非,导致新药获批的研究用药品(IMP)完成的随机临床试验的百分比。

结果

根据印度和南非的搜索标准,共确定了622项符合条件的随机对照试验。按同一申办者和同一研究性新药(IND)进行聚类后,得到453项符合条件的试验,即印度224项,南非229项。欧盟/美国以及印度和南非之间市场应用批准情况的分布显示,在有印度和/或南非试验中心参与的临床试验中,39.6%(印度)的临床试验和60.1%(南非)的临床试验在未获得印度或南非新药申请(NDA)批准的情况下在欧盟/美国获得了上市许可。

结论

尽管临床试验活动有所增加,但在印度和南非开展的试验数量与这些新药的市场可得性之间仍存在明显差距。药品监管当局、研究者、机构审查委员会和患者群体应致力于确保在其本国人群中经过试验和研究的新药能够在市场上供应。

相似文献

1
A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa.对在印度和南非开展的临床试验及后续药品批准情况的批判性评估。
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 31;5(8):e007304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007304.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Evaluation of Drug Trials in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries and Local Commercial Availability of Newly Approved Drugs.高、中、低收入国家药物试验评估和新批准药物的当地商业供应情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217075. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7075.
4
Analysis of Control Arm Quality in Randomized Clinical Trials Leading to Anticancer Drug Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的抗癌药物随机临床试验中的对照臂质量。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):887-892. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0167.
5
Evaluation of Drug Lags in Development Initiation, New Drug Application and Approval Between Japan and the USA and the Impact of Local Versus Multi-regional Clinical Trials.评估日本和美国在药物研发启动、新药申请和批准方面的滞后情况,以及局部与多区域临床试验的影响。
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Jul;35(4):253-260. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00393-w. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Lifestyle InterVention IN Gestational diabetes (LIVING) in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka: protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.印度、孟加拉国和斯里兰卡妊娠期糖尿病生活方式干预(LIVING):一项随机对照试验的过程评估方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e037774. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037774.
7
Regulatory and operational challenges in conducting Asian International Academic Trial for expanding the indications of cancer drugs.在开展亚洲国际学术试验以扩大癌症药物适应症方面的监管和运营挑战。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May;14(3):1015-1025. doi: 10.1111/cts.12965. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Comparison between European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in Granting Accelerated Marketing Authorizations for Covid-19 Medicines and their Utilized Regulations.比较欧洲药品管理局和美国食品和药物管理局在授予新冠病毒药物加速营销授权及其使用规定方面的情况。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):79-113. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00574-6. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Pharmacovigilance in India, Uganda and South Africa with reference to WHO's minimum requirements.印度、乌干达和南非的药物警戒工作,参考世卫组织的最低要求。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Mar 9;4(5):295-305. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.55.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries.不同发展程度的非洲发展中国家临床研究的患者获益情况
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021 Nov 24;96:100656. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100656. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of the European Union on access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.欧盟对低收入和中等收入国家药品可及性的影响:一项范围综述
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Oct 7;9:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100219. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Linking market authorizations of medicines with disease burden in South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trials have gone global: is this a good thing?临床试验走向全球化:这是好事吗?
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001228. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
2
Clinical trials registered in clinical trial registry of India: A survey.印度临床试验注册中心登记的临床试验:一项调查。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;2(4):289-92. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.85953.
3
Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.新药研发相关风险趋势:研究药物的成功率。
将南非药品的市场授权与疾病负担联系起来。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Apr 1;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00314-x.
4
How Civil Society Organisations Changed the Regulation of Clinical Trials in India.民间社会组织如何改变了印度临床试验的监管
Sci Cult (Lond). 2018 Jul 13;28(2):200-222. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2018.1493449. eCollection 2019.
5
The role of corruption and unethical behaviour in precluding the placement of industry sponsored clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: Stakeholder views.腐败和不道德行为在阻碍撒哈拉以南非洲地区开展行业赞助的临床试验方面所起的作用:利益相关者的观点。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Apr 30;3:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.009. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
6
Which Benefits Are Mentioned Most Often in Drug Development Publications?药物研发出版物中最常提及的益处有哪些?
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2017 Oct 16;86:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2017.10.002. eCollection 2017.
7
It is time to revise the international Good Clinical Practices guidelines: recommendations from non-commercial North-South collaborative trials.是时候修订国际药物临床试验规范指南了:来自非商业性南北合作试验的建议。
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Nov 16;1(3):e000122. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000122. eCollection 2016.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):272-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
4
Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.临床研究全球化的伦理与科学影响
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):816-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb0803929.
5
Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.针对经济弱势群体的临床研究。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jul;33(7):382-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017681.
6
Distributive justice and clinical trials in the Third World.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2001 Jun;22(3):169-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1011419820440.