Suppr超能文献

对在印度和南非开展的临床试验及后续药品批准情况的批判性评估。

A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa.

作者信息

Limaye Dnyanesh, Langer Janka Marisa, Rühling Tjorben, Fortwengel Gerhard

机构信息

Faculty III, Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 31;5(8):e007304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007304.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relation between the number of clinical trials conducted and respective new drug approvals in India and South Africa.

DESIGN

Construction and analysis of a comprehensive database of completed randomised controlled clinical trials based on clinicaltrials.gov from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2010 and drug approval data from 2006 until 2013 for India and South Africa.

SETTING

USA, the EU, India and South Africa.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of completed randomised clinical trials for an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) leading to new drug approval in India and South Africa.

RESULTS

A total of 622 eligible randomised controlled trials were identified as per search criteria for India and South Africa. Clustering them for the same sponsor and the same Investigational New Drug (IND) resulted in 453 eligible trials, that is, 224 for India and 229 for South Africa. The distribution of the market application approvals between the EU/USA as well as India and South Africa revealed that out of clinical trials with the participation of test centres in India and/or South Africa, 39.6% (India) clinical trials and 60.1% (South Africa) clinical trials led to market authorisation in the EU/USA without a New Drug Application (NDA) approval in India or South Africa.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in clinical trial activities, there is a clear gap between the number of trials conducted and market availability of these new drugs in India and South Africa. Drug regulatory authorities, investigators, institutional review boards and patient groups should direct their efforts to ensuring availability of new drugs in the market that have been tested and researched on their population.

摘要

目的

评估在印度和南非开展的临床试验数量与相应新药获批情况之间的关系。

设计

基于clinicaltrials.gov构建并分析一个关于2005年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间完成的随机对照临床试验的综合数据库,以及印度和南非2006年至2013年的药物获批数据。

地点

美国、欧盟、印度和南非。

主要观察指标

在印度和南非,导致新药获批的研究用药品(IMP)完成的随机临床试验的百分比。

结果

根据印度和南非的搜索标准,共确定了622项符合条件的随机对照试验。按同一申办者和同一研究性新药(IND)进行聚类后,得到453项符合条件的试验,即印度224项,南非229项。欧盟/美国以及印度和南非之间市场应用批准情况的分布显示,在有印度和/或南非试验中心参与的临床试验中,39.6%(印度)的临床试验和60.1%(南非)的临床试验在未获得印度或南非新药申请(NDA)批准的情况下在欧盟/美国获得了上市许可。

结论

尽管临床试验活动有所增加,但在印度和南非开展的试验数量与这些新药的市场可得性之间仍存在明显差距。药品监管当局、研究者、机构审查委员会和患者群体应致力于确保在其本国人群中经过试验和研究的新药能够在市场上供应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验