Tucker S, Sutcliffe C, Bowns I, Challis D, Saks K, Verbeek H, Cabrera E, Karlsson S, Leino-Kilpi H, Meyer G, Soto M E
a Personal Social Services Research Unit , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
b Department of Internal Medicine , University of Tartu , Tartu , Estonia.
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Dec;20(12):1327-1338. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078285. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
To examine whether the mix of community and institutional long-term care (ILTC) for people with dementia (PwD) in Europe could be improved; assess the economic consequences of providing alternative services for particular groups of ILTC entrants and explore the transnational application of the 'Balance of Care' (BoC) approach.
A BoC study was undertaken in Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK as part of the RightTimePlaceCare project. Drawing on information about 2014 PwD on the margins of ILTC admission, this strategic planning framework identified people whose needs could be met in more than one setting, and compared the relative costs of the possible alternatives.
The findings suggest a noteworthy minority of ILTC entrants could be more appropriately supported in the community if enhanced services were available. This would not necessarily require innovative services, but more standard care (including personal and day care), assuming quality was ensured. Potential cost savings were identified in all countries, but community care was not always cheaper than ILTC and the ability to release resources varied between nations.
This is believed to be the first transnational application of the BoC approach, and demonstrates its potential to provide a consistent approach to planning across different health and social care systems. Better comparative information is needed on the number of ILTC entrants with dementia, unit costs and outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings offer important evidence on the appropriateness of current provision, and the opportunity to learn from different countries' experience.
研究欧洲痴呆症患者(PwD)的社区和机构长期护理(ILTC)组合是否能够得到改善;评估为特定群体的ILTC新入住者提供替代服务的经济后果,并探索“护理平衡”(BoC)方法的跨国应用。
作为“RightTimePlaceCare”项目的一部分,在爱沙尼亚、芬兰、法国、德国、荷兰、西班牙、瑞典和英国开展了一项BoC研究。该战略规划框架利用2014年ILTC入院边缘的PwD信息,确定了那些需求可以在不止一种环境中得到满足的人,并比较了可能替代方案的相对成本。
研究结果表明,如果能提供强化服务,相当一部分ILTC新入住者可以在社区得到更适当的支持。这不一定需要创新服务,而是更多的标准护理(包括个人护理和日托),前提是确保质量。所有国家都确定了潜在的成本节约,但社区护理并不总是比ILTC便宜,而且各国释放资源的能力也有所不同。
这被认为是BoC方法的首次跨国应用,并证明了其为不同卫生和社会护理系统提供一致规划方法的潜力。需要关于患有痴呆症的ILTC新入住者数量、单位成本和结果的更好的比较信息。尽管如此,研究结果为当前服务的适宜性提供了重要证据,也提供了借鉴不同国家经验的机会。