Suppr超能文献

一种用于在Wistar大鼠中应用巴索、贝蒂和布雷斯纳汉量表的计算机系统。

A computerized system for the application of Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale in Wistar rats.

作者信息

Molina Alessandra Eira Iague Sleiman, Cristante Alexandre Fogaça, de Barros Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa, Molina Marcos Sleiman, Molina Tainá Peral

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina Instituto do Coração (InCor), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):179-83. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230400673.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test a computer program to assist researchers in assigning scores in the application of the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale and to compare these scores when doing so in free, targeted and automated computer-assisted modes.

METHOD

To test the program, the participants used the Impactor methodology recommended by the New York University (USA), in which 12 Wistar rats submitted to spinal cord injury were filmed on the 28(th) day after the injury. Eight researchers from the Laboratory of Medical Investigation, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil took part in the study. The two heads of the laboratory, with 15 years of experience in the application of the scale, were considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

The results of the scale application were not significantly different in relation to the gold standard, considering the mean of the evaluators in each method: free, targeted and automated form (with the help of the computer).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the BBB scale in the automated mode, using the computer program, did not present any difference in relation to the gold standard for all the evaluators. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.

摘要

目的

开发并测试一个计算机程序,以协助研究人员在应用巴索、比蒂和布雷斯纳汉(BBB)量表时进行评分,并比较在自由、有针对性和自动计算机辅助模式下进行评分时的结果。

方法

为测试该程序,参与者采用了美国纽约大学推荐的撞击器方法,在脊髓损伤后的第28天对12只接受脊髓损伤的Wistar大鼠进行拍摄。巴西圣保罗大学医学院医学调查实验室的8名研究人员参与了该研究。该实验室的两位负责人在量表应用方面有15年经验,被视为金标准。

结果

考虑到每种方法(自由、有针对性和自动形式(借助计算机))中评估者的平均值,量表应用结果与金标准相比无显著差异。

结论

使用计算机程序以自动模式应用BBB量表,对所有评估者而言,与金标准相比没有任何差异。证据级别II,诊断性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06a1/4544524/dc850e74e3a4/1413-7852-aob-23-04-00179-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验