• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对基于计算机的听觉处理评估(Feather Squadron)有效性的初步调查。

An initial investigation into the validity of a computer-based auditory processing assessment (Feather Squadron).

作者信息

Barker Matthew D, Purdy Suzanne C

机构信息

a Speech Science, School of Psychology, University of Auckland , New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2016;55(3):173-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074734. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

DOI:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074734
PMID:26329098
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This research investigates a novel method for identifying and measuring school-aged children with poor auditory processing through a tablet computer.

DESIGN

Feasibility and test-retest reliability are investigated by examining the percentage of Group 1 participants able to complete the tasks and developmental effects on performance. Concurrent validity was investigated against traditional tests of auditory processing using Group 2.

STUDY SAMPLE

There were 847 students aged 5 to 13 years in group 1, and 46 aged 5 to 14 years in group 2.

RESULTS

Some tasks could not be completed by the youngest participants. Significant correlations were found between results of most auditory processing areas assessed by the Feather Squadron test and traditional auditory processing tests. Test-retest comparisons indicated good reliability for most of the Feather Squadron assessments and some of the traditional tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate the Feather Squadron assessment is a time-efficient, feasible, concurrently valid, and reliable approach for measuring auditory processing in school-aged children. Clinically, this may be a useful option for audiologists when performing auditory processing assessments as it is a relatively fast, engaging, and easy way to assess auditory processing abilities. Research is needed to investigate further the construct validity of this new assessment by examining the association between performance on Feather Squadron and objective evoked potential, lesion studies, and/or functional imaging measures of auditory function.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨一种通过平板电脑识别和测量听觉处理能力较差的学龄儿童的新方法。

设计

通过检查第1组参与者能够完成任务的百分比以及对表现的发育影响来研究可行性和重测信度。使用第2组针对传统听觉处理测试来研究同时效度。

研究样本

第1组有847名5至13岁的学生,第2组有46名5至14岁的学生。

结果

最年幼的参与者无法完成某些任务。通过“羽之中队”测试评估的大多数听觉处理区域的结果与传统听觉处理测试之间存在显著相关性。重测比较表明,“羽之中队”的大多数评估以及一些传统测试具有良好的信度。

结论

结果表明,“羽之中队”评估是一种测量学龄儿童听觉处理能力的省时、可行、同时有效且可靠的方法。临床上,这可能是听力学家在进行听觉处理评估时的一个有用选项,因为它是一种相对快速、有趣且易于评估听觉处理能力的方式。需要通过研究“羽之中队”表现与客观诱发电位、病变研究和/或听觉功能的功能成像测量之间的关联,进一步调查这种新评估的结构效度。

相似文献

1
An initial investigation into the validity of a computer-based auditory processing assessment (Feather Squadron).对基于计算机的听觉处理评估(Feather Squadron)有效性的初步调查。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(3):173-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074734. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential and Behavioral Evidence for Differences in Auditory Processing between Good and Poor Readers.优秀阅读者与阅读困难者在听觉加工方面差异的皮层听觉诱发电位及行为学证据
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):534-545. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16054.
3
The use of the to identify auditory processing disorders in South African children: a comparative study.利用 对南非儿童听觉处理障碍进行识别:一项对比研究。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Mar;62(3):245-252. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2033858. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
4
Treating Deficits in Auditory Processing Abilities.治疗听觉处理能力缺陷。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):416-427. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00001. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.学童中枢听觉处理筛查程序。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May-Jun;85(3):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Auditory and cognitive abilities of children suspected of auditory processing disorder (APD).疑似听觉处理障碍(APD)儿童的听觉和认知能力。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jun;74(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
7
Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder.希腊语言语嘈杂环境测试(SinB)作为听觉处理障碍潜在筛查工具的重测信度。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;131:109848. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Auditory Training Effects on the Listening Skills of Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.听觉训练对听觉处理障碍儿童听力技能的影响。
Ear Hear. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):38-47. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000225.
9
Auditory processing disorders: relationship to cognitive processes and underlying auditory neural integrity.听觉处理障碍:与认知过程及潜在听觉神经完整性的关系
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Feb;78(2):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.048. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
10
Can speech-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response become a useful tool in clinical practice?言语诱发听觉脑干反应能否成为临床实践中的有用工具?
Codas. 2016 Jan-Feb;28(1):77-80. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162014231.

引用本文的文献

1
AudBility: an online program for central auditory processing screening in school-aged children from 6 to 8 years old.AudBility:一个用于 6 至 8 岁学龄儿童的在线中央听觉处理筛查程序。
Codas. 2023 Aug 28;35(6):e20220011. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022011. eCollection 2023.
2
AudBility: test-retest reliability in typically developing children aged 6 to 7 years.AudBility:6 至 7 岁正常发育儿童的重测信度。
Codas. 2022 Jul 25;34(6):e20210219. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219pt. eCollection 2022.
3
Verification of a Mobile Psychoacoustic Test System.
一种移动心理声学测试系统的验证
Audiol Res. 2021 Dec 13;11(4):673-690. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11040061.
4
AudBility: Effectiveness of an online central auditory processing screening program.奥登比力:在线中央听觉处理筛查项目的效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256593. eCollection 2021.
5
Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.学童中枢听觉处理筛查程序。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May-Jun;85(3):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.