• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AudBility:6 至 7 岁正常发育儿童的重测信度。

AudBility: test-retest reliability in typically developing children aged 6 to 7 years.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde, Interdisciplinaridade e Reabilitação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP), Brasil.

Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Centro de Investigação em Pediatria, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2022 Jul 25;34(6):e20210219. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219pt. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219pt
PMID:35894308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886299/
Abstract

PURPOSE

to investigate the test-retest reliability of the AudBility program in typically developing children aged six-seven years.

METHODS

29 children, male and female, right-handed, native Portuguese speakers and adequate school performance for the age group studied, underwent previous meatoscopy, immittance measurements and the AudBility program was applied, composed of a self-perception questionnaire and auditory tasks, being analyzed the abilities of sound localization, auditory closure, figure-ground, dichotic digits test, temporal resolution, and temporal ordering of frequency and duration. The program was designed and reapplied with an interval of one week under the same conditions. The performance in each task was presented from central tendency and dispersion data and was conducted using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), based on the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The analyses showed a positive and significant ICC (p<0.01) for the questionnaire and auditory tasks, except for auditory closure, in the right and left ears and figure-ground in the left ear. The questionnaire mean ICC was 0.742 and ranged from -0.012 to 0.698 for the auditory tasks.

CONCLUSION

Based on mean results and upper limit of the CI, the findings showed agreement between moments, classified as good for the questionnaire and moderate to good for five of the seven auditory analyzed tasks (ICC>0.05 and <0.9). The results of the reliability study represent an important parameter for validating the program for the studied age group.

摘要

目的

调查 AudBility 程序在 6-7 岁正常发育儿童中的重测信度。

方法

29 名儿童,男女不限,右利手,母语为葡萄牙语,且在研究年龄组中的学业表现良好,接受过先前的耳镜检查、声导抗测量和 AudBility 程序测试,该程序由自我感知问卷和听觉任务组成,分析了声音定位、听觉闭合、图形-背景、双耳分听数字测试、时间分辨率和频率及时长的时间顺序能力。该程序在相同条件下,间隔一周进行设计和重新应用。每个任务的表现均采用集中趋势和离散数据进行呈现,并使用基于 95%置信区间(CI)的组内相关系数(ICC)进行分析。

结果

分析显示,问卷和听觉任务(除了右耳和左耳的听觉闭合以及左耳的图形-背景)的 ICC 为正且显著(p<0.01)。问卷的平均 ICC 为 0.742,而听觉任务的平均 ICC 范围为-0.012 至 0.698。

结论

基于平均结果和 CI 的上限,发现两个时间点之间存在一致性,问卷的一致性被归类为良好,而对于七个分析的听觉任务中的五个任务,一致性为中等至良好(ICC>0.05 且<0.9)。该可靠性研究的结果为该程序在研究年龄组中的有效性提供了重要参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/9886299/976914751be1/codas-34-6-e20210219-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/9886299/d1f7b3851ba1/codas-34-6-e20210219-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/9886299/976914751be1/codas-34-6-e20210219-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/9886299/d1f7b3851ba1/codas-34-6-e20210219-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/9886299/976914751be1/codas-34-6-e20210219-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
AudBility: test-retest reliability in typically developing children aged 6 to 7 years.AudBility:6 至 7 岁正常发育儿童的重测信度。
Codas. 2022 Jul 25;34(6):e20210219. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021219pt. eCollection 2022.
2
AudBility: Effectiveness of an online central auditory processing screening program.奥登比力:在线中央听觉处理筛查项目的效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256593. eCollection 2021.
3
Computer-based central auditory processing screening for school-age children (audBility): an initial investigation.针对学龄儿童的基于计算机的中枢听觉处理筛查(audBility):初步调查。
Codas. 2019 Apr 1;31(2):e20180157. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018157.
4
Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Randomized Dichotic Digits in Learning-Disabled Children: Implications for Dichotic Listening Training.学习障碍儿童随机化双耳数字的重测信度和最小可检测变化:对双耳分听训练的启示
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Mar;29(3):223-232. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16134.
5
The Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT): Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies Part 1.双耳数字差异测试(DDdT):开发、常模数据及重测信度研究 第1部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):458-469. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15084.
6
AudBility: an online program for central auditory processing screening in school-aged children from 6 to 8 years old.AudBility:一个用于 6 至 8 岁学龄儿童的在线中央听觉处理筛查程序。
Codas. 2023 Aug 28;35(6):e20220011. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022011. eCollection 2023.
7
Investigating the Interaction between Dichotic Deficits and Cognitive Abilities Using the Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT) Part 2.使用双耳数字差异测试(DDdT)研究双耳缺陷与认知能力之间的相互作用 第2部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):470-479. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15085.
8
The use of the dichotic digit test as a screening method.使用双耳分听数字测试作为一种筛查方法。
Codas. 2021 Aug 23;33(6):e20200314. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202020314. eCollection 2021.
9
A Nonsense Consonant-Vowel-Consonant Word Test to Assess Auditory Processing.一种用于评估听觉处理的无意义辅音-元音-辅音单词测试。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Sep;29(8):675-684. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16052.
10
Variability of the dichotic sentence test in the test and retest of normal hearing adults.正常听力成年人在双耳分听句子测试中的重测变异性。
Codas. 2020 Jun 26;32(3):e20190040. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019040. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment-2: A Test of Auditory Processing Disorder.多重听觉处理评估-2的效度:一项听觉处理障碍测试
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Oct 2;51(4):993-1006. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00001. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
2
The effects of otitis media with effusion on the measurement of auditory evoked potentials.中耳积液对听觉诱发电位测量的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;133:109978. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109978. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Auditory processing disorder evaluations and cognitive profiles of children with specific learning disorder.
特定学习障碍儿童的听觉处理障碍评估与认知概况
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019 May 31;4:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2019.05.001. eCollection 2019.
4
Otitis Media: Long-Term Effect on Central Auditory Nervous System.中耳炎:对中枢听觉神经系统的长期影响
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 28;2019:8930904. doi: 10.1155/2019/8930904. eCollection 2019.
5
Computer-based central auditory processing screening for school-age children (audBility): an initial investigation.针对学龄儿童的基于计算机的中枢听觉处理筛查(audBility):初步调查。
Codas. 2019 Apr 1;31(2):e20180157. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018157.
6
Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.学童中枢听觉处理筛查程序。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May-Jun;85(3):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
8
Auditory Processing Disorder: What Does It Mean and What Can Be Done?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Jun;38(5):349-351. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000450.
9
Auditory Perception, Suprasegmental Speech Processing, and Vocabulary Development in Chinese Preschoolers.中国学龄前儿童的听觉感知、超音段语音处理与词汇发展
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Oct;123(2):365-82. doi: 10.1177/0031512516663164. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.