Suppr超能文献

三种不同股骨转子骨折股骨头固定装置的滑动与股骨头旋转比较

Comparison of the Sliding and Femoral Head Rotation among Three Different Femoral Head Fixation Devices for Trochanteric Fractures.

作者信息

Chinzei Nobuaki, Hiranaka Takafumi, Niikura Takahiro, Tsuji Mitsuo, Kuroda Ryosuke, Doita Minoru, Kurosaka Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Takatsuki General Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Sep;7(3):291-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.291. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, various femoral head fixation devices (HFDs) for trochanteric fractures have become available. However, there are some cases in which femoral head rotation with excessive sliding of the HFD is observed and it is often followed by cutout. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the three types of HFDs to prevent femoral head rotation.

METHODS

Between July 2005 and December 2009, 206 patients aged over 60 years with trochanteric fractures who had undergone surgical treatment using a short femoral nail in our institution were enrolled into the study. We used the gamma 3 nail (GMN) as the screw-type HFD in 66 cases, the gliding nail (GLN) as a non-cylindrical blade in 76 cases, and the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) as a cylindrical blade in 64 cases. The sliding length of HFDs and the occurrence of femoral head rotation were evaluated by assessing radiographs as the main outcome, and the results were compared among these devices.

RESULTS

A comparison of the degree of sliding in the GMN group showed that femoral head rotation was observed significantly more frequently in cases with rotation. Further, it appeared that femoral head rotation occurred more frequently in comminuted fractures. However, no significant differences between the sliding lengths of the different HFDs were observed among three groups. Femoral head rotation was observed in 15 cases of GMN (22.7%), 0 case of GLN, and 5 case of PFNA (7.8%). Significant differences with regard to the occurrence of femoral head rotation were observed among the three groups. Furthermore, significant differences were also observed between GLN and PFNA with respect to the occurrence of femoral head rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to stabilize femoral head appears to be greater with blade-type materials than with screw-type materials. Furthermore, we believe that a non-cylindrical blade is preferable to a cylindrical blade for the surgical treatment of comminuted, unstable trochanteric fractures in order to prevent femoral head rotation and cut-out.

摘要

背景

最近,各种用于转子间骨折的股骨头固定装置(HFDs)已可供使用。然而,在某些情况下,会观察到HFD过度滑动导致股骨头旋转,并且常常随后出现内固定物穿出。本研究的目的是比较三种类型的HFD预防股骨头旋转的能力。

方法

2005年7月至2009年12月期间,在我们机构接受使用短股骨钉手术治疗的206例60岁以上转子间骨折患者纳入本研究。我们将66例患者使用伽马3钉(GMN)作为螺钉型HFD,76例患者使用滑动钉(GLN)作为非圆柱形刀片,64例患者使用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)作为圆柱形刀片。以评估X线片作为主要结局指标,评估HFD的滑动长度和股骨头旋转的发生情况,并比较这些装置之间的结果。

结果

GMN组滑动程度的比较显示,旋转病例中股骨头旋转的观察频率明显更高。此外,在粉碎性骨折中股骨头旋转似乎更频繁发生。然而,三组之间不同HFD的滑动长度未观察到显著差异。GMN组有15例(22.7%)观察到股骨头旋转,GLN组0例,PFNA组5例(7.8%)。三组之间在股骨头旋转的发生方面观察到显著差异。此外,在股骨头旋转的发生方面,GLN和PFNA之间也观察到显著差异。

结论

刀片型材料稳定股骨头的能力似乎比螺钉型材料更强。此外,我们认为,对于粉碎性、不稳定的转子间骨折的手术治疗,非圆柱形刀片比圆柱形刀片更适合,以防止股骨头旋转和内固定物穿出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0214/4553275/38fd0ca636f1/cios-7-291-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验