Turgut Ali, Kalenderer Önder, Karapınar Levent, Kumbaracı Mert, Akkan Hasan Ali, Ağuş Haluk
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
, 25. Yıl Konutları B1 Blok Daire 10 Onur Mah. Bayraklı, Izmir, Turkey.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2410-3. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Mechanical complications, such as cut-out of the head-neck fixation device, are the most common causes of morbidity after trochanteric femur fracture treatment. The causes of cut-out complications are well defined in patients who are treated with sliding hip screws and biaxial cephalomedullary nails but there are few reports about the patients who are treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most important factor about occurance of cutout complication and also to evaluate the risks of the combination of each possible factors.
Overally 298 patients were enrolled in the study. Medical records were reviewed for patients' age, fracture type, gender, anesthesia type and occurance of cut-out complication. Postoperatively taken radiographs were reviewed for tip-apex distance, obtained collo-diaphyseal angle, the quadrant of the helical blade and Ikuta reduction subgroup. The most important factor (s) and also predicted probability of cut-out complication was calculated for each combination of factors.
Cut-out complication was observed in 14 patients (4.7 %). The most important factor about occurrence of the cut-out complication was found as varus reduction (p: 0.01), the second important factor was found as implantation of the helical blade in the improper quadrant (p: 0.02). Tip-apex distance was found as third important factor (p: 0.10). The predicted probability of cut-out complication was calculated as 45.6 % when whole of the four surgeon dependent factors were improperly obtained.
Althought obtaining proper tip-apex distance is important to prevent cutout complication in these fractures, if the fracture is not reduced in varus position and helical blade is inserted in the proper quadrant, possibility of cut-out complication is very low even in the patients with high tip-apex distance.
机械并发症,如头颈固定装置穿出,是股骨转子间骨折治疗后最常见的发病原因。在使用滑动髋螺钉和双轴髓内钉治疗的患者中,穿出并发症的原因已明确,但关于使用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗的患者的相关报道较少。
本研究的目的是评估穿出并发症发生的最重要因素,并评估各可能因素组合的风险。
本研究共纳入298例患者。回顾患者的病历,记录患者的年龄、骨折类型、性别、麻醉类型及穿出并发症的发生情况。术后复查X线片,测量尖顶距、颈干角、螺旋刀片所在象限及Ikuta复位亚组。计算各因素组合的最重要因素及穿出并发症的预测概率。
14例患者(4.7%)出现穿出并发症。发现内翻复位是穿出并发症发生的最重要因素(p:0.01),其次是螺旋刀片植入象限不当(p:0.02)。尖顶距是第三重要因素(p:0.10)。当所有四个与手术医生相关的因素都未得到妥善处理时,穿出并发症的预测概率计算为45.6%。
虽然获得合适的尖顶距对预防这些骨折的穿出并发症很重要,但如果骨折未在内翻位复位且螺旋刀片插入合适象限,即使尖顶距较高的患者,穿出并发症的可能性也非常低。