Jensen Ole T, Adams Mark W, Butura Caesar, Galindo Daniel F
Private practice, Greenwood Village, Colo.
Private practice, Greenwood Village, Colo.
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
The V-4 implant placement technique is important for restoring patients with maxillary atrophy, but little has been documented on the outcomes of these treatments.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate function after 1 year when implants were placed without vertical bone augmentation in Cawood-Howell Classes IV-VI maxillary atrophy (Class C-D by the "all-on-four" site classification) with the nasal crest, lateral pyriform rim, and sometimes the zygoma for apical implant fixation.
Function of implants that had been immediately loaded were studied retrospectively after 1 year in 44 patients from 2 different clinics. For each patient studied, 2 angled implants were placed in the midline in the nasal crest/vomer area, and typically, 2 implants were engaged apically in the lateral pyriform rim bilaterally. All 4 of the implants used were angled toward the midline in a V formation, termed "V-4" implant placement. Insertion torque, anterior-posterior spread, implant diameter, implant length, and posterior cantilever were recorded. Implant survival and bone stability were assessed after 1 year. When the lateral pyriform was highly deficient (Class D), zygomatic implants were used posteriorly.
A total of 179 implants were placed in 44 patients followed for 1 to 3 years. Six implants were lost, all in 1 patient. Anterior-posterior spread averaged 16 mm, with an average cantilever of 7.5 mm. Except for the lost implant sites, bone levels were stable throughout treatment for all patients.
The use of 4 implants angled toward the midline, including 2 implants placed into a V-shaped point at the nasal crest and 2 implants placed into an M-shaped point at the pyriform rim bilaterally, showed good stability after 1 year despite gross absence of bone mass as a result of severe maxillary atrophy. The V-4 placement pattern is important for patients with deficient bone mass between the sinus and nasal cavities. In Class D situations where lateral nasal rim bone mass is nearly absent, zygomatic implants can be used.
V - 4种植体植入技术对于上颌骨萎缩患者的修复很重要,但关于这些治疗结果的文献记载很少。
本研究的目的是评估在Cawood - Howell IV - VI级上颌骨萎缩(“全口四颗”位点分类中的C - D级)患者中,使用鼻嵴、梨状孔外侧缘,有时还使用颧骨进行种植体根尖固定,在不进行垂直骨增量的情况下植入种植体1年后的即刻功能结果。
对来自2家不同诊所的44例患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者的种植体已即刻加载,1年后观察其功能。对于每例研究患者,在鼻嵴/犁骨区域的中线处植入2枚成角种植体,通常在双侧梨状孔外侧缘的根尖处各植入2枚种植体。所使用的全部4枚种植体呈V形朝向中线排列,称为“V - 4”种植体植入方式。记录植入扭矩、前后跨度、种植体直径、种植体长度和后悬臂长度。1年后评估种植体的存留率和骨稳定性。当梨状孔外侧高度不足(D级)时,在后方使用颧骨种植体。
44例患者共植入179枚种植体,随访1至3年。6枚种植体脱落,均发生在1例患者身上。前后跨度平均为16 mm,平均悬臂长度为7.5 mm。除了种植体脱落的部位外,所有患者在整个治疗过程中骨水平均保持稳定。
使用4枚朝向中线成角的种植体,包括在鼻嵴处以V形点植入2枚种植体,在双侧梨状孔边缘处以M形点植入2枚种植体,尽管由于严重上颌骨萎缩导致骨量严重缺失,但1年后仍显示出良好的稳定性。V - 4植入模式对于鼻窦和鼻腔之间骨量不足的患者很重要。在D级情况下,即梨状孔外侧缘骨量几乎缺失时,可使用颧骨种植体。