Lazareva Olga F, Wasserman Edward A
Drake University, 324 Olin Hall, Department of Psychology, Drake University, Des Moines, IA 50311, United States.
The University of Iowa, United States.
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
We trained pigeons to respond to one key when two consecutive displays were the same as one another (no-change trial) and to respond to another key when the two displays were different from one another (change trial; change detection task). Change-trial displays were distinguished by a change in all three features (color, orientation, and location) of all four items presented in the display. Pigeons learned this change-no change discrimination to high levels of accuracy. In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared replace trials in which one or two features were replaced by novel features to switch trials in which the features were exchanged among the objects. Pigeons reported both replace and switch trials as "no-change" trials. In contrast, adult humans in Experiment 3 reported both types of trials as "change" trials and showed robust evidence for feature binding. In Experiment 4, we manipulated the total number of objects in the display and the number of objects that underwent change. Unlike people, pigeons showed strong control by the number of feature changes in the second display; pigeons' failure to exhibit feature binding may therefore be attributed to their failure to attend to items in the displays as integral objects.
我们训练鸽子,使其在两个连续的显示彼此相同时(无变化试验)对一个按键做出反应,而在两个显示彼此不同时(变化试验;变化检测任务)对另一个按键做出反应。变化试验的显示通过显示中呈现的所有四个项目的所有三个特征(颜色、方向和位置)的变化来区分。鸽子学会了这种变化 - 无变化辨别,准确率很高。在实验1和实验2中,我们将一个或两个特征被新特征替换的替换试验与特征在物体之间交换的切换试验进行了比较。鸽子将替换试验和切换试验都报告为“无变化”试验。相比之下,实验3中的成年人将这两种试验都报告为“变化”试验,并显示出特征绑定的有力证据。在实验4中,我们操纵了显示中的物体总数以及发生变化的物体数量。与人类不同,鸽子受到第二个显示中特征变化数量的强烈影响;因此,鸽子未能表现出特征绑定可能归因于它们未能将显示中的项目作为完整的物体来关注。