Baldwin Andrew C W, Sandoval Elena, Letsou George V, Mallidi Hari R, Cohn William E, Frazier O H
Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and the Center for Cardiac Support, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex.
Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and the Center for Cardiac Support, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
Ventricular reconditioning and device weaning in select patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVADs) has been shown to be feasible. However, little is known regarding the outcomes associated with different surgical methods of device removal. We examined the effect of surgical explantation approach on early and late outcomes.
We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients who underwent successful ventricular weaning and CF LVAD explantation at our center. Patients were stratified by surgical approach. Descriptive univariate statistics, multivariate regression, and survival analyses were performed. Patients were censored by transplant, device reimplantation, or end of follow-up.
Twenty-seven patients were identified who underwent successful removal of a CF LVAD (25 HeartMate II, 2 HeartWare) after 532 ± 424 days of support (range, 42-1937 days). Four approaches were used that vary primarily in the degree of retained pump material: complete pump removal with plug ventriculotomy closure (n = 13; 48%), pump housing explant with ligation of the inflow and outflow grafts (n = 7; 26%), ligation of the outflow graft and driveline transection (n = 5; 19%), and driveline transection alone (n = 2; 7%). Mean overall postexplant survival was 1286 ± 947 days (range, 143-3072 days). Overall time-to-event and survival analyses showed no significant association between surgical approach and postoperative length of stay (P = .7), stroke (P = .12), reoperation (P = .4), or survival (P = .12).
For patients who receive device therapy, pump deactivation and removal represents a favorable outcome. All methods are feasible and produce similar early and late survival and clinical outcomes.
已证明在部分使用连续流左心室辅助装置(CF LVAD)的患者中进行心室修复和装置撤离是可行的。然而,对于不同的装置移除手术方法相关的结局知之甚少。我们研究了手术取出方法对早期和晚期结局的影响。
我们回顾性分析了在我们中心成功进行心室撤离和CF LVAD取出的所有患者的数据。患者按手术方法分层。进行了描述性单变量统计、多变量回归和生存分析。患者因移植、装置再植入或随访结束而被截尾。
确定了27例患者,他们在接受532±424天(范围42 - 1937天)的支持后成功移除了CF LVAD(25例HeartMate II,2例HeartWare)。使用了四种方法,主要区别在于保留的泵材料程度:通过封堵心室切开术完全移除泵(n = 13;48%)、移除泵壳并结扎流入和流出移植物(n = 7;26%)、结扎流出移植物并切断驱动线(n = 5;19%)以及仅切断驱动线(n = 2;7%)。取出后平均总生存期为1286±947天(范围143 - 3072天)。总体事件发生时间和生存分析表明,手术方法与术后住院时间(P = 0.7)、中风(P = 0.12)、再次手术(P = 0.4)或生存(P = 0.12)之间无显著关联。
对于接受装置治疗的患者,停用并移除泵代表了一个良好的结局。所有方法都是可行的,并且产生相似的早期和晚期生存及临床结局。