• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期野火期间的细颗粒物(PM2.5)暴露与因哮喘前往急诊科就诊的情况

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) exposure during a prolonged wildfire period and emergency department visits for asthma.

作者信息

Haikerwal Anjali, Akram Muhammad, Sim Malcolm R, Meyer Mick, Abramson Michael J, Dennekamp Martine

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

CSIRO, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):88-94. doi: 10.1111/resp.12613. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1111/resp.12613
PMID:26346113
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The 2006-2007 wildfire period was one of the most extensive and long lasting fires in Australian history with high levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ). Large populations were exposed to smoke for over 2 months. The study aimed to investigate the association between wildfire-related PM2.5 exposure and emergency department (ED) visits for asthma.

METHODS

A time-stratified case-crossover design was used to investigate associations between daily average PM2.5 and ED attendances for asthma from December 2006 to January 2007. ED data were obtained from the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset. Smoke dispersion during the wildfire event was modelled using a validated chemical transport model. Exposure data (daily average PM2.5 , temperature and relative humidity) were modelled for the study period. Various lag periods were investigated.

RESULTS

There were 2047 ED attendances for asthma during the study period. After adjusting for temperature and relative humidity, an interquartile range increase in PM2.5 levels of 8.6 μg/m(3) was associated with an increase in ED attendances for asthma by 1.96% (95%CI: 0.02, 3.94) on the day of exposure. Lag periods up to 2 days prior did not show any association. A strong association was observed among women 20 years and older (5.08% 95%CI: 1.76, 8.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Wildfire-related PM2.5 was associated with increased risk of ED attendance for asthma during the wildfire event. It is important to understand the role of wildfire PM2.5 as a trigger for asthma presentations.

摘要

背景与目的

2006 - 2007年的野火期是澳大利亚历史上规模最大、持续时间最长的火灾时期之一,期间空气中细颗粒物(PM2.5)含量很高。大量人群暴露于烟雾中长达两个多月。本研究旨在调查野火相关的PM2.5暴露与因哮喘前往急诊科就诊之间的关联。

方法

采用时间分层病例交叉设计,调查2006年12月至2007年1月期间日均PM2.5与因哮喘前往急诊科就诊之间的关联。急诊科数据来自维多利亚州紧急最低数据集。利用经过验证的化学传输模型对野火事件期间的烟雾扩散进行建模。对研究期间的暴露数据(日均PM2.5、温度和相对湿度)进行建模。研究了不同的滞后时间。

结果

研究期间有2047例因哮喘前往急诊科就诊的病例。在调整温度和相对湿度后,暴露当天PM2.5水平每增加一个四分位间距8.6 μg/m³,因哮喘前往急诊科就诊的人数增加1.96%(95%置信区间:0.02,3.94)。直至暴露前2天的滞后时间均未显示出任何关联。在20岁及以上女性中观察到强烈关联(5.08%,95%置信区间:1.76,8.51)。

结论

野火相关的PM2.5与野火事件期间因哮喘前往急诊科就诊的风险增加有关。了解野火PM2.5作为哮喘发作诱因的作用很重要。

相似文献

1
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) exposure during a prolonged wildfire period and emergency department visits for asthma.长期野火期间的细颗粒物(PM2.5)暴露与因哮喘前往急诊科就诊的情况
Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):88-94. doi: 10.1111/resp.12613. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
2
The San Diego 2007 wildfires and Medi-Cal emergency department presentations, inpatient hospitalizations, and outpatient visits: An observational study of smoke exposure periods and a bidirectional case-crossover analysis.圣地亚哥 2007 年野火事件与加州医疗补助计划急诊就诊、住院和门诊就诊:暴露于烟雾期的观察性研究和双向病例交叉分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 10;15(7):e1002601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002601. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
Impact of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Exposure During Wildfires on Cardiovascular Health Outcomes.野火期间暴露于细颗粒物(PM2.5)对心血管健康结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 15;4(7):e001653. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001653.
4
The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study.2012年科罗拉多州野火烟雾与呼吸及心血管疾病急诊科就诊的关联:一项病例交叉研究
Environ Health. 2016 Jun 4;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0146-8.
5
Air pollution events from forest fires and emergency department attendances in Sydney, Australia 1996-2007: a case-crossover analysis.1996 - 2007年澳大利亚悉尼森林火灾引发的空气污染事件与急诊科就诊情况:病例交叉分析
Environ Health. 2014 Dec 10;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-105.
6
Wildfire smoke exposure and emergency department visits for headache: A case-crossover analysis in California, 2006-2020.野火烟雾暴露与头痛急诊就诊:2006-2020 年加利福尼亚州的病例交叉分析。
Headache. 2023 Jan;63(1):94-103. doi: 10.1111/head.14442. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
Particulate matter and emergency visits for asthma: a time-series study of their association in the presence and absence of wildfire smoke in Reno, Nevada, 2013-2018.颗粒物与哮喘急诊就诊:2013-2018 年内华达州里诺市有/无野火烟雾情况下二者相关性的时间序列研究
Environ Health. 2020 Aug 27;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00646-2.
8
Coal-mine fire-related fine particulate matter and medical-service utilization in Australia: a time-series analysis from the Hazelwood Health Study.澳大利亚煤矿火灾相关细颗粒物与医疗服务利用情况的时间序列研究:来自 Hazelwood 健康研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):80-93. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz219.
9
Differential respiratory health effects from the 2008 northern California wildfires: A spatiotemporal approach.2008年北加利福尼亚野火对呼吸系统健康的差异影响:一种时空分析方法。
Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
Associations between ozone, PM2.5, and four pollen types on emergency department pediatric asthma events during the warm season in New Jersey: a case-crossover study.新泽西州暖季臭氧、PM2.5 与四种花粉浓度与儿科急诊哮喘事件的关联:病例交叉研究。
Environ Res. 2014 Jul;132:421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A Community-Based Assessment of Attitudes, Health Impacts and Protective Actions During the 24-Day Hangar Fire in Tustin, California.加利福尼亚州图斯廷24天机库火灾期间基于社区的态度、健康影响及保护行动评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 26;22(7):1003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071003.
2
Immune-mediated disease caused by climate change-associated environmental hazards: mitigation and adaptation.气候变化相关环境危害导致的免疫介导疾病:缓解与适应
Front Sci. 2024;2. doi: 10.3389/fsci.2024.1279192. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Impact of the 2023 wildfire smoke episodes in Ontario, Canada, on asthma and other health outcomes: an interrupted time-series analysis.
2023年加拿大安大略省野火烟雾事件对哮喘及其他健康结果的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
CMAJ. 2025 May 4;197(17):E465-E477. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241506.
4
The association between fire smoke exposure and emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA): A systematic review and meta-analysis.火灾烟雾暴露与急诊科就诊及住院治疗之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 19;10(19):e38024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38024. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
5
A case-crossover analysis to quantify the impact of wildfire smoke on hospital respiratory admissions in the Rogue Valley, Oregon.一项病例交叉分析,以量化野火烟雾对俄勒冈州罗格河谷医院呼吸道住院人数的影响。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Aug 23;8:100540. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100540. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
A mouse model of wildfire smoke-induced health effects: sex differences in acute and sustained effects of inhalation exposures.一种用于研究野火烟雾引发健康效应的小鼠模型:吸入暴露的急性和持续效应中的性别差异。
Inhal Toxicol. 2024 Jul;36(6):367-377. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2024.2354398. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Clearing the Air: Understanding the Impact of Wildfire Smoke on Asthma and COPD.净化空气:了解野火烟雾对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;12(3):307. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030307.
8
Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke on Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.野火烟雾对儿童和青少年健康影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Mar;11(1):46-60. doi: 10.1007/s40572-023-00420-9. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
9
Wildland Fires Worsened Population Exposure to PM Pollution in the Contiguous United States.野火使美国毗邻地区的人口更加暴露于 PM 污染之下。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 5;57(48):19990-19998. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05143. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
A SPATIAL CAUSAL ANALYSIS OF WILDLAND FIRE-CONTRIBUTED PM USING NUMERICAL MODEL OUTPUT.利用数值模型输出对野火导致的颗粒物进行空间因果分析
Ann Appl Stat. 2022 Dec;16(4):2714-2731. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1610. Epub 2022 Sep 26.