Johnson Sophia L, Bartels Christie M, Palta Mari, Thorpe Carolyn T, Weiss Jennifer M, Smith Maureen A
Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 7;5(9):e008597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008597.
To examine the frequency and predictors of antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) use, and to describe steroid utilisation among US patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) aged 65 years and older prior to the publication of a new Medicare quality measure calling for the use of anti-TNFs and other steroid-sparing agents.
Retrospective cohort study.
This study utilised 2006-2009 claims data for a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries.
Patients with IBD (>1 claim for ICD codes 555.xx, 556.xx) without anti-TNF contraindications, enrolled in Medicare parts A and B ≥12 months and part D ≥6 months were included (n=8502).
We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CIs predicting new anti-TNF therapy using multivariable Poisson regression.
This nationally representative study of older patients with IBD estimated that only 3.7% received anti-TNFs. New anti-TNF use (1.4%) was associated with younger age, absence of Medicaid coverage, hospitalisation, and higher preceding use of burst (IRR=2.35, CI 1.59 to 3.47) and maintenance steroids (IRR=2.40, CI 1.05 to 5.48). Among anti-TNF users, we observed high rates of concurrent maintenance steroid use (19%).
Anti-TNF use was very low in this population of older patients with IBD and, importantly, was often combined with maintenance steroid use despite guidelines suggesting reduced needs. Expanding IBD-specific quality measures to include steroid taper plans may cue appropriate maintenance regimens that include anti-TNFs and other steroid sparing agents while reducing protracted concomitant steroid use as intended by current quality measures.
在一项要求使用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和其他类固醇节约剂的新医疗保险质量指标发布之前,研究65岁及以上美国炎症性肠病(IBD)患者使用抗TNF药物的频率和预测因素,并描述其类固醇使用情况。
回顾性队列研究。
本研究利用了2006 - 2009年全国医疗保险受益人的索赔数据。
纳入患有IBD(国际疾病分类代码555.xx、556.xx的索赔记录>1条)且无抗TNF药物使用禁忌证、参加医疗保险A部分和B部分≥12个月以及D部分≥6个月的患者(n = 8502)。
我们使用多变量泊松回归估计预测新抗TNF治疗的发病率比(IRR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
这项针对老年IBD患者的全国代表性研究估计,只有3.7%的患者接受了抗TNF药物治疗。新使用抗TNF药物(1.4%)与年龄较小、没有医疗补助覆盖、住院以及之前较高的冲击剂量(IRR = 2.35,CI 1.59至3.47)和维持类固醇药物使用(IRR = 2.40,CI 1.05至5.48)有关。在抗TNF药物使用者中,我们观察到同时使用维持类固醇药物的比例很高(19%)。
在这一老年IBD患者群体中,抗TNF药物的使用非常低,重要的是,尽管指南建议减少需求,但抗TNF药物通常仍与维持类固醇药物联合使用。扩大IBD特异性质量指标以纳入类固醇减量计划,可能提示合适的维持治疗方案,包括使用抗TNF药物和其他类固醇节约剂,同时按当前质量指标的预期减少长期联合使用类固醇药物的情况。