Roman Horace, Abo Carole, Huet Emmanuel, Bridoux Valérie, Auber Mathieu, Oden Stephane, Marpeau Loïc, Tuech Jean-Jacques
1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France 2 Research Group EA 4308, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France 3 Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France 4 Digestive Tract Research Group EA3234/IFRMP23, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Oct;58(10):957-66. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000447.
To date, a majority of patients presenting with large endometriosis of the rectum are managed worldwide by colorectal resection. However, postoperative rectal function may be impacted by radical rectal surgery.
The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes of patients with rectal endometriosis who are managed by full-thickness disc excision and to compare outcomes of the 2 procedures using a transanal approach.
This was a prospective study.
The study was conducted at a university hospital.
Fifty patients with colorectal endometriosis that was managed by disc excision between June 2009 and November 2014 were included in the study.
The procedure included laparoscopic deep shaving, followed by full-thickness disc excision to remove the shaved rectal area. Disc excision was performed using a semicircular transanal stapler (the Rouen technique) in 20 patients, an end-to-end anastomosis circular transanal stapler in 28 patients, and transvaginal excision in 2 patients.
Preoperative and postoperative assessments of pelvic symptoms and digestive function using standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires were the main measures.
The largest diameter of specimens achieved was significantly higher using the Rouen technique (58 ± 9 mm) than the end-to-end anastomosis stapler (34 ± 6 mm). Two rectovaginal fistulas were recorded (4%), and 8 patients presented with transitory bladder voiding (16%). Median postoperative values for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire improved progressively 1 and 3 years after surgery. For patients intending to get pregnant, the cumulative pregnancy rate was 80%, and 63% of pregnancies were spontaneous.
The study sample size is small and the design is not comparative; however, direct comparison of patients managed by disc excision and colorectal resection would be inappropriate, because of differences regarding nodule localization and size.
Disc excision is a valuable alternative to colorectal resection in selected patients presenting with rectal endometriosis, achieving better preservation of rectal function. The Rouen technique allows for successful removal of large nodules of the low and midrectum, with favorable postoperative outcomes. (See video abstract, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A208.).
迄今为止,全球范围内,大多数直肠巨大子宫内膜异位症患者接受结直肠切除术治疗。然而,根治性直肠手术可能会影响术后直肠功能。
本研究旨在评估采用全层盘状切除术治疗的直肠子宫内膜异位症患者的术后结局,并比较经肛门途径的两种手术方式的结局。
这是一项前瞻性研究。
该研究在一家大学医院进行。
纳入2009年6月至2014年11月间采用盘状切除术治疗的50例结直肠子宫内膜异位症患者。
手术包括腹腔镜深度刮除,然后进行全层盘状切除术以切除刮除的直肠区域。20例患者使用半圆形经肛门吻合器(鲁昂技术)进行盘状切除术,28例患者使用端端吻合圆形经肛门吻合器,2例患者采用经阴道切除术。
主要指标为使用标准化胃肠道问卷对术前和术后盆腔症状及消化功能进行评估。
采用鲁昂技术获得的标本最大直径(58±9mm)显著大于端端吻合器组(34±6mm)。记录到2例直肠阴道瘘(4%),8例患者出现短暂性膀胱排尿障碍(16%)。术后1年和3年,胃肠道生活质量指数及诺尔斯-埃克斯利-斯科特症状问卷的中位数逐渐改善。对于有妊娠意愿的患者,累积妊娠率为80%,63%的妊娠为自然妊娠。
本研究样本量小且设计无对照;然而,由于结节定位和大小存在差异,对采用盘状切除术和结直肠切除术治疗的患者进行直接比较并不合适。
对于部分直肠子宫内膜异位症患者,盘状切除术是结直肠切除术的一种有价值的替代方法,能更好地保留直肠功能。鲁昂技术可成功切除直肠中下段的大结节,术后结局良好。(见视频摘要,http://links.lww.com/DCR/A208.)