Arinto-Garcia Raquel, Pinho Marcos Daniel, Carriço João André, Melo-Cristino José, Ramirez Mário
Instituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Instituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Nov;53(11):3580-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01892-15. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
The heterogeneity of members of the Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) has traditionally hampered their correct identification. Recently, the group was subdivided into 6 taxa whose prevalence among human infections is poorly described. We evaluated the accuracy of the Rapid ID32 Strep test, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and a PCR multiplex method to identify 212 SAG isolates recovered from human infections to the species and subspecies level by using multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) as the gold standard. We also determined the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates. Representatives of all SAG taxa were found among our collection. MALDI-TOF MS and the Rapid ID32 Strep test correctly identified 92% and 68% of the isolates to the species level, respectively, but showed poor performance at the subspecies level, and the latter was responsible for major identification errors. The multiplex PCR method results were in complete agreement with the MLSA identifications but failed to distinguish the subspecies Streptococcus constellatus subsp. pharyngis and S. constellatus subsp. viborgensis. A total of 145 MLSA sequence types were present in our collection, indicating that within each taxon a number of different lineages are capable of causing infection. Significant antibiotic resistance was observed only to tetracycline, erythromycin, and clindamycin and was present in most taxa. MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable method for routine SAG species identification, while the need for identification to the subspecies level is not clearly established.
咽峡炎链球菌群(SAG)成员的异质性传统上阻碍了对它们的正确鉴定。最近,该菌群被细分为6个分类单元,其在人类感染中的流行情况鲜有描述。我们评估了快速ID32链球菌试验、基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)以及一种聚合酶链反应(PCR)多重方法的准确性,这些方法通过多位点序列分析(MLSA)作为金标准,将从人类感染中分离出的212株SAG菌株鉴定到种和亚种水平。我们还测定了这些菌株的抗菌药敏性。在我们收集的菌株中发现了所有SAG分类单元的代表菌株。MALDI-TOF MS和快速ID32链球菌试验分别将92%和68%的菌株正确鉴定到种水平,但在亚种水平表现不佳,后者导致了主要的鉴定错误。多重PCR方法的结果与MLSA鉴定结果完全一致,但未能区分星群链球菌咽峡炎亚种和星群链球菌维堡亚种。我们收集的菌株中共有145种MLSA序列类型,这表明在每个分类单元内,许多不同的谱系都能够引起感染。仅观察到对四环素、红霉素和克林霉素有显著的抗生素耐药性,并且在大多数分类单元中都存在。MALDI-TOF MS是一种用于常规SAG菌种鉴定的可靠方法,而对于亚种水平鉴定的必要性尚未明确确立。