Suppr超能文献

从建立患者参与小组中吸取的经验教训:一份奥钦报告。

Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report.

作者信息

Arkind Jill, Likumahuwa-Ackman Sonja, Warren Nate, Dickerson Kay, Robbins Lynn, Norman Kathy, DeVoe Jennifer E

机构信息

From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):632-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150009.

Abstract

There is renewed interest in patient engagement in clinical and research settings, creating a need for documenting and publishing lessons learned from efforts to meaningfully engage patients. This article describes early lessons learned from the development of OCHIN's Patient Engagement Panel (PEP). OCHIN supports a national network of more than 300 community health centers (CHCs) and other primary care settings that serve over 1.5 million patients annually across nearly 20 states. The PEP was conceived in 2009 to harness the CHC tradition of patient engagement in this new era of patient-centered outcomes research and to ensure that patients were engaged throughout the life cycle of our research projects, from conception to dissemination. Developed by clinicians and researchers within our practice-based research network, recruitment of patients to serve as PEP members began in early 2012. The PEP currently has a membership of 18 patients from 3 states. Over the past 24 months, the PEP has been involved with 12 projects. We describe developing the PEP and challenges and lessons learned (eg, recruitment, funding model, creating value for patient partners, compensation). These lessons learned are relevant not only for research but also for patient engagement in quality improvement efforts and other clinical initiatives.

摘要

患者参与临床和研究领域再度受到关注,这就需要记录并发表从切实让患者参与的努力中吸取的经验教训。本文介绍了从俄勒冈健康信息网络患者参与小组(PEP)的发展中吸取的早期经验教训。俄勒冈健康信息网络支持一个由300多家社区健康中心(CHC)及其他初级保健机构组成的全国性网络,这些机构每年为近20个州的150多万患者提供服务。PEP成立于2009年,旨在利用社区健康中心让患者参与的传统,在这个以患者为中心的结果研究的新时代,并确保患者在我们研究项目的整个生命周期中都能参与其中,从构思到传播。由我们基于实践的研究网络中的临床医生和研究人员开发,招募患者担任PEP成员于2012年初开始。PEP目前有来自3个州的18名患者成员。在过去的24个月里,PEP参与了12个项目。我们描述了PEP的发展过程以及面临的挑战和吸取的经验教训(例如,招募、资金模式、为患者合作伙伴创造价值、补偿)。这些经验教训不仅与研究相关,也与患者参与质量改进工作及其他临床举措相关。

相似文献

1
Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):632-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150009.
4
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
6
Development of a veteran engagement toolkit for researchers.
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Jun;7(6):595-602. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0101. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Engagement Strategies to Advance Community-Centered Primary Care.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Nov/Dec;23 Suppl 6 Suppl, Gulf Region Health Outreach Program:S66-S70. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000662.
8
The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):591-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002744. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z.
10
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Arts-Based Methods to Enhance Patient Engagement in Health Research.
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70127. doi: 10.1111/hex.70127.
2
Community partner coauthorship for increased implementation science impact: Strengthening capacity and engagement.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 20;8(1):e129. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.574. eCollection 2024.
4
A Cross Sectional Survey of Recruitment Practices, Supports, and Perceived Roles for Unaffiliated and Non-scientist Members of IRBs.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023;14(3):174-184. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2180107. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Partner-developed electronic health record tools to facilitate social risk-informed care planning.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):869-877. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad010.
9
Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers.
J Patient Exp. 2021 Jan 13;8:2374373520981484. doi: 10.1177/2374373520981484. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research.
JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1513-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11100.
2
Mission, margin, and the role of consumer governance in decision-making at community health centers.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 May;25(2):930-47. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0107.
3
The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):591-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002744. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
6
Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):397-407. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.44.
10
Do patients have a voice? The social stratification of health center governing boards.
Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):430-7. doi: 10.1111/hex.12059. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验