• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers.患者参与医学教育研究:一项医学教育研究者国际调查的结果
J Patient Exp. 2021 Jan 13;8:2374373520981484. doi: 10.1177/2374373520981484. eCollection 2021.
2
Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey.临床医生教育工作者在机构审查委员会的经历:一项全国性调查结果
Acad Med. 2008 Jun;83(6):590-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318172347a.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects.利益相关者参与系统评价:一项关于方法、结果和效果的系统评价方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 21;3:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4. eCollection 2017.
5
Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey.让消费者参与随机对照试验的设计、实施和结果解读:问卷调查
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):519-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.519.
6
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.患者权益倡导者对参与卫生技术评估的看法:国际概览
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
7
Consumer and community involvement in health and medical research: evaluation by online survey of Australian training workshops for researchers.消费者和社区参与健康与医学研究:通过在线调查对澳大利亚研究人员培训工作坊进行评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 9;2:16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0030-2. eCollection 2016.
8
Educational needs of oncology pharmacists: A survey by the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.肿瘤药学教育需求:国际肿瘤药学实践协会调查。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr;27(3):623-634. doi: 10.1177/1078155220929754. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?我应该让谁参与我的研究,为什么?患者、护理人员还是公众?
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00282-1.
10
Sustainability and scalability of a volunteer-based primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY): a mixed-methods analysis.基于志愿者的初级保健干预措施(健康织锦)的可持续性和可扩展性:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2468-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of patients' and caregivers' perspectives on educating healthcare providers.一项关于患者及其护理人员对医疗服务提供者教育看法的定性研究。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Sep 14;12(4):7-16. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71541. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research: a scoping review protocol.卫生服务研究中患者参与的模型与框架:一项范围综述方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Sep 10;4:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0111-5. eCollection 2018.
2
What do young people with rheumatic conditions in the UK think about research involvement? A qualitative study.英国患有风湿性疾病的年轻人对参与研究有何看法?一项定性研究。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018 May 24;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0251-z.
3
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
4
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
5
Reflections from a Patient and Carer on Involvement in Research and Integrating Care in the Health System.一位患者及护理者对参与研究和卫生系统中整合式照护的思考
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 27;17(2):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3088.
6
Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.患者参与研究的新兴指南。
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Arts-Based Learning: A New Approach to Nursing Education Using Andragogy.基于艺术的学习:一种运用成人教育学的护理教育新方法。
J Nurs Educ. 2016 Jul 1;55(7):407-10. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20160615-10.
8
Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study.这值得吗?患者及公众对其参与健康研究的影响及其评估的看法:一项基于英国的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):519-528. doi: 10.1111/hex.12479. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Authentic Engagement Of Patients And Communities Can Transform Research, Practice, And Policy.患者和社区的真正参与能够改变研究、实践和政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):590-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1512.
10
Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102.提高调查的回应率并评估无回应偏差:AMEE指南第102号
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):217-28. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

患者参与医学教育研究:一项医学教育研究者国际调查的结果

Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers.

作者信息

Moreau Katherine A, Eady Kaylee, Heath Sarah E

机构信息

Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2021 Jan 13;8:2374373520981484. doi: 10.1177/2374373520981484. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1177/2374373520981484
PMID:34179357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8205367/
Abstract

There are demands to involve patients in medical education research (MER). This study surveyed researchers to examine the extent and nature of patient involvement in MER. It obtained 283 completed surveys (response rate of 5%). Of the respondents, 153 (54.1%) indicated that they involve patients in MER. Of these respondents, 102 (66.7%) stated that patients are data sources in MER, 41 (26.8%) noted that patients are involved as advisors and/or reviewers, and/or 22 (14.4%) indicated that patients are involved as team members. These respondents reported that they involve patients to improve the relevance of their MER to patients (n = 99; 64.7%), connect MER to patient outcomes (n = 98; 64.1%), and improve the appropriateness of MER (n = 92; 60.1%). The 130 respondents who do not involve patients in MER do not involve them because they believe that their research topic(s) are irrelevant to patients (n = 68; 52.3%), they have limited resources for patient involvement (n = 40; 30.8%), and/or they do not know how to involve patients (n = 28; 21.5%). Researchers need to consider how they can conduct their MER with patients.

摘要

目前存在让患者参与医学教育研究(MER)的需求。本研究对研究人员进行了调查,以考察患者参与MER的程度和性质。共获得283份完整的调查问卷(回复率为5%)。在受访者中,153人(54.1%)表示他们在MER中让患者参与。在这些受访者中,102人(66.7%)称患者是MER中的数据来源,41人(26.8%)指出患者作为顾问和/或评审员参与其中,和/或22人(14.4%)表示患者作为团队成员参与。这些受访者报告称,他们让患者参与是为了提高MER与患者的相关性(n = 99;64.7%)、将MER与患者的治疗结果联系起来(n = 98;64.1%)以及提高MER的适宜性(n = 92;60.1%)。在MER中不让患者参与的130名受访者不这样做的原因是,他们认为自己的研究主题与患者无关(n = 68;52.3%)、患者参与的资源有限(n = 40;30.8%)和/或不知道如何让患者参与(n = 28;21.5%)。研究人员需要考虑如何与患者一起开展他们的MER。