Tufanaru Catalin, Munn Zachary, Stephenson Matthew, Aromataris Edoardo
The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 115 Grenfell Street, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):196-207. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065.
Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.
系统评价旨在系统地识别、严格评估和总结所有符合预定义标准并回答预定义问题的相关研究。最常见的系统评价类型是评估一种干预措施或治疗方法的有效性。在本文中,我们讨论在对有效性数据进行系统评价和荟萃分析时出现的一些常见方法学问题,包括与研究设计、荟萃分析以及效应量的使用和解释相关的问题。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013-6-5
Front Pharmacol. 2025-7-23