Suppr超能文献

超微血管成像(SMI)在检测乳腺病变血流信号中的诊断价值:一项比较SMI与彩色多普勒血流成像的初步研究

The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging.

作者信息

Ma Yan, Li Gang, Li Jing, Ren Wei-Dong

机构信息

From the Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001502.

Abstract

The correlation between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) for detecting blood flow in breast lesions was investigated, as was the diagnostic value of SMI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.These lesions were evaluated using both CDFI and SMI according to Adler's method. Pathologic examination showed 57 malignant lesions and 66 benign lesions. The number of blood vessels in a single mass was detected by 2 techniques (SMI and CDFI), and the difference between the 2 values (SMI-CDFI) was calculated. The optimal threshold for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasms and the diagnostic performances of SMI, CDFI, and SMI-CDFI were calculated.For the total lesions and malignant lesions alone, the difference between SMI and CDFI for detecting blood flow was significant (P < 0.01), but the difference was not significant for benign lesions (P = 0.15). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.82) for CDFI; 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) for SMI; and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95) for SMI-CDFI. Furthermore, the modality of "SMI-CDFI" showed the best diagnostic performance.SMI provides further microvessel information in breast lesions. The diagnostic modality of "SMI-CDFI" can improve the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in the differentiation between benign and malignant masses.

摘要

研究了彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)与超微血管成像(SMI)在检测乳腺病变血流方面的相关性,以及SMI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的诊断价值。根据阿德勒方法,使用CDFI和SMI对这些病变进行评估。病理检查显示57个恶性病变和66个良性病变。通过两种技术(SMI和CDFI)检测单个肿块中的血管数量,并计算两个值之间的差异(SMI - CDFI)。计算诊断恶性肿瘤的最佳阈值以及SMI、CDFI和SMI - CDFI的诊断性能。对于全部病变和单独的恶性病变,SMI和CDFI在检测血流方面的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01),但对于良性病变差异无统计学意义(P = 0.15)。CDFI的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.73(95%置信区间[CI]:0.64 - 0.82);SMI为0.81(95% CI:0.74 - 0.89);SMI - CDFI为0.89(95% CI:0.82 - 0.95)。此外,“SMI - CDFI”模式显示出最佳诊断性能。SMI提供了乳腺病变中更多的微血管信息。“SMI - CDFI”诊断模式可提高超声在鉴别良恶性肿块中的诊断性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7422/4616654/9d049aeb07f8/medi-94-e1502-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验