Suppr超能文献

运动试验和心肌灌注成像对疑似及已知冠心病患者的风险重新分类改善情况的差异

Differential risk reclassification improvement by exercise testing and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with suspected and known coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Koh Angela S, Gao Fei, Chin C T, Keng Felix Y J, Tan Ru-San, Chua Terrance S J

机构信息

National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):366-78. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0253-x. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare the incremental prognostic and net risk reclassification value of exercise testing alone vs exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for estimating the risk of death in patients with suspected and known coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

6702 patients with suspected CAD and 2008 with known CAD had treadmill exercise MPI and were followed for 2.5 ± 0.9 years for the occurrence of all-cause death. The estimation of risk of death and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were examined in three models. Model 1: clinical variables; Model 2: model 1+Duke Treadmill Score; and Model 3: model 2+ MPI variables. Risk estimates were categorized as <1%, 1-3%, and >3% risk of death per year.

RESULTS

In patients with suspected CAD, the global Chi-square for predicting risk of death increased significantly for Model 2 compared to Model 1 (74.78 vs 63.86 to (P = .001). However, adding MPI variables in Model 3 did not further improve predictive value (Chi-square 79.38, P = .10). In patients with suspected CAD risk, reclassification improved significantly in Model 2 over Model 1 (NRI = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.22, P = .019), but not in Model 3 (NRI = 0.0009, 95% CI -0.072 to 0.070; P = .98). In contrast, in patients with known CAD Model 2 did not yield significant improvements for predicting risk and risk reclassification compared to Model 1. However, global Chi-square of Model 3 was significantly higher than that of Model 2 (30.03 vs 6.56, P < .0001) with associated significant reclassification improvement (NRI = 0.26 95% CI 0.067 to 0.46. P = .0084).

CONCLUSION

Risk reclassification by diagnostic testing is importantly influenced by baseline characteristics of patient cohorts. In patients with suspected CAD, NRI is predominately achieved by exercise variables, whereas in patients with known CAD, greatest NRI is obtained by MPI variables.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较单纯运动试验与运动心肌灌注成像(MPI)在评估疑似和已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者死亡风险方面的增量预后价值和净风险重新分类价值。

方法

6702例疑似CAD患者和2008例已知CAD患者进行了平板运动MPI,并随访2.5±0.9年以观察全因死亡的发生情况。在三个模型中检查死亡风险估计和净重新分类改善(NRI)。模型1:临床变量;模型2:模型1+杜克平板运动评分;模型3:模型2+MPI变量。风险估计分为每年死亡风险<1%、1-3%和>3%。

结果

在疑似CAD患者中,与模型1相比,模型2预测死亡风险的总体卡方值显著增加(74.78对63.86,P=0.001)。然而,在模型3中添加MPI变量并未进一步提高预测价值(卡方值79.38,P=0.10)。在疑似CAD风险患者中,模型2的重新分类比模型1有显著改善(NRI=0.12,95%CI 0.02至0.22,P=0.019),但模型3中没有(NRI=0.0009,95%CI -0.072至0.070;P=0.98)。相比之下,在已知CAD患者中,与模型1相比,模型2在预测风险和风险重新分类方面没有显著改善。然而,模型3的总体卡方值显著高于模型2(30.03对6.56,P<0.0001),伴有显著的重新分类改善(NRI=0.26,95%CI 0.067至0.46,P=0.0084)。

结论

诊断测试的风险重新分类受患者队列基线特征的重要影响。在疑似CAD患者中,NRI主要通过运动变量实现,而在已知CAD患者中,最大的NRI通过MPI变量获得。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验