• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非传统因素对 SPECT 心肌灌注成像后冠状动脉造影的转诊影响。

Non-traditional factors affecting referral for coronary angiography following SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):1141-1155. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02419-3. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12350-020-02419-3
PMID:33152097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. Although prior studies have shown disparities in the use of invasive angiography in patients with acute MI, data on factors affecting referral to angiography post-MPI are lacking. We sought to evaluate the primary determinants of referral to invasive angiography post-MPI and specifically assess the role of non-traditional non-clinical factors such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, and marital status.

METHODS

All patients without known CAD who underwent stress SPECT MPI over 15 years were reviewed and the performance of coronary angiography within 90 days of their MPI was recorded. Multiple factors were analyzed for an association with referral to angiography, including exercise and MPI results, baseline demographics, traditional cardiac risk factors, and non-traditional factors such as ethnicity, insurance, marital and socioeconomic status. In a secondary analysis, these factors were assessed with regard to abnormal MPI results.

RESULTS

Out of 27,895 total patients, 2,150 (7.7%) underwent invasive coronary angiography. On multivariate analysis, inpatient location, positive ECG response, and abnormal MPI results were the strongest predictors of angiography. Non-traditional factors such as race/ethnicity and insurance status had a significant association with referral to angiography with Caucasians (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71, P < .0001) and those with private insurance (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.62, P = .001) or Medicare (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.56, P = .006) having higher rates of angiography despite controlling for traditional risk factors and test results.

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate that non-traditional factors such as race/ethnicity and insurance status influence patient management decisions and impact the performance of downstream cardiac invasive testing after stress MPI. Higher rates of angiography in Caucasians, privately insured and Medicare patients were seen despite controlling for traditional risk factors and abnormal test results. Further research is needed to better understand these disparities, especially in the current healthcare environment.

摘要

背景

心肌灌注成像(MPI)在冠心病(CAD)管理中的应用已得到充分证实。尽管先前的研究表明,急性心肌梗死患者接受有创血管造影术的差异,但缺乏关于影响 MPI 后血管造影术转诊因素的数据。我们旨在评估 MPI 后血管造影术转诊的主要决定因素,并特别评估种族/民族、社会经济因素、保险状况和婚姻状况等非传统非临床因素的作用。

方法

回顾了 15 年来所有无已知 CAD 病史并接受应激 SPECT MPI 的患者,并记录了其 MPI 后 90 天内的冠状动脉造影情况。分析了多种因素与血管造影术转诊的关系,包括运动和 MPI 结果、基线人口统计学、传统心脏危险因素以及非传统因素,如种族、保险、婚姻和社会经济状况。在二次分析中,评估了这些因素与异常 MPI 结果的关系。

结果

在 27895 名患者中,2150 名(7.7%)接受了有创冠状动脉造影术。多变量分析显示,住院地点、心电图阳性反应和异常 MPI 结果是血管造影术的最强预测因素。非传统因素,如种族/民族和保险状况与转诊至血管造影术有显著关联,白人(OR 1.42,95%CI 1.18-1.71,P<0.0001)和私人保险(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.13-1.62,P=0.001)或医疗保险(OR 1.30,95%CI 1.08-1.56,P=0.006)的患者尽管控制了传统危险因素和检测结果,但接受血管造影术的比率更高。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,种族/民族和保险状况等非传统因素会影响患者的管理决策,并影响应激 MPI 后下游心脏有创性检查的执行。尽管控制了传统危险因素和异常检测结果,仍观察到白人、私人保险和医疗保险患者接受血管造影术的比率更高。需要进一步研究以更好地了解这些差异,尤其是在当前的医疗保健环境中。

相似文献

1
Non-traditional factors affecting referral for coronary angiography following SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.非传统因素对 SPECT 心肌灌注成像后冠状动脉造影的转诊影响。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):1141-1155. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02419-3. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.症状性 CAD 患者药物负荷 SPECT 和 PET MPI 临床疗效的随机比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;12(9):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Real-world evidence study on the impact of SPECT MPI, PET MPI, cCTA and stress echocardiography on downstream healthcare utilisation in patients with coronary artery disease in the US.美国真实世界研究:SPECT MPI、PET MPI、cCTA 和负荷超声心动图对冠心病患者医疗资源利用的影响
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04225-y.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.与心肌灌注成像(MPI)相比,64排无创计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CCTA)的诊断准确性:PICTURE研究,一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.320 层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉造影联合腺苷负荷心肌灌注显像诊断准确性的初步研究。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):1812-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2788-z. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in liver transplantation candidates.肝移植候选者的单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):254-265. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1388-3. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.美国接受用于冠心病诊断的影像学方法的患者人群的特征和关键差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 May 15;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03218-7.
8
Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Acquired Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.计算机断层血管造影和单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像诊断冠状动脉疾病的准确性
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;8(10):e003533. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003533.
9
Risk stratification among diabetic patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.糖尿病患者行应激心肌灌注显像的危险分层。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):529-38. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9731-1. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像正常的受试者中高危冠状动脉疾病的预测因素
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):530-41. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0150-3. Epub 2015 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Is faster always better? What is the implication of a shorter time to imaging with tetrofosmin compared to sestamibi?速度更快就总是更好吗?与 sestamibi 相比,用替曲膦进行成像的时间更短意味着什么?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):2629-2632. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02143-y. Epub 2020 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Differential risk reclassification improvement by exercise testing and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with suspected and known coronary artery disease.运动试验和心肌灌注成像对疑似及已知冠心病患者的风险重新分类改善情况的差异
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):366-78. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0253-x. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
2
Disparities by insurance status in quality of care for elderly patients with unstable angina.老年不稳定型心绞痛患者医疗护理质量在保险状况方面的差异。
Ethn Dis. 2006 Autumn;16(4):799-807.
3
Is coronary angiography underused in an inner-city population?
冠状动脉造影术在市中心区人群中是否未得到充分利用?
Ethn Dis. 2006 Summer;16(3):659-65.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiac catheterization for acute myocardial infarction in the United States, 1995--2001.1995 - 2001年美国急性心肌梗死心脏导管插入术的种族和民族差异
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;97(3):317-23.