Suppr超能文献

胃镜检查的镇静:这是一个被充分理解且经过充分告知的选择吗?

Sedation for gastroscopy: Is it an adequately understood and informed choice?

作者信息

Quinn L, Kelly M E, Khan A, Irwin R, Khan W, Barry K, Waldron R, Khan I Z

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo General Hospital, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2016 Nov;185(4):785-789. doi: 10.1007/s11845-015-1354-x. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sedation uptake rates for oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) vary greatly. Issues concerning adequate information and consent have been raised. Additionally, patient comprehension of sedation options is inconsistent.

METHODS

A closed ended questionnaire was created and delivered to assess patient understanding regarding sedation prior to OGD. The questionnaire was based on British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients were recruited. 90 % of the sedated and 73 % of the unsedated patients were satisfied with their respective decisions (OR 0.283, *p = 0.01). 65 % were unaware of basic differences between conscious sedation and general anesthesia, and 37 % were unaware that driving is permitted after having throat spray alone. The most informed of the age groups had the lowest uptake of sedation and the least informed had the highest uptake.

CONCLUSION

The decision to undergo gastroscopy with or without sedation is not a sufficiently informed one. This study highlights the need for the widespread dissemination of good quality information to inform patients better regarding sedation prior to OGD.

摘要

引言

食管胃十二指肠镜检查(OGD)的镇静使用率差异很大。已经出现了关于充分告知信息和取得同意的问题。此外,患者对镇静选择的理解也不一致。

方法

设计并发放了一份封闭式问卷,以评估患者在接受OGD之前对镇静的理解。该问卷基于英国胃肠病学会的指南。

结果

招募了111名患者。90%接受镇静的患者和73%未接受镇静的患者对各自的决定感到满意(比值比0.283,p = 0.01)。65%的患者不知道清醒镇静和全身麻醉之间的基本区别,37%的患者不知道仅使用咽喉喷雾剂后即可驾车。年龄组中了解情况最多的人群镇静使用率最低,了解情况最少的人群镇静使用率最高。

结论

接受或不接受镇静进行胃镜检查的决定没有得到充分的信息告知。本研究强调需要广泛传播高质量信息,以便患者在接受OGD之前能更好地了解镇静情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验